Author Topic: Fr. hαɾɾιson corrects The Wanderer for their misinterpretation of EENS (Read 25274 times)

LM · « **Reply #85 on:** March 06, 2011, 10:34:52 AM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: Caraffa
Saying that "If the Church didn't specifically condemn something then it's to OK hold or even do" isn't very logical.

Jehanne wants things to be be condemned that are not condemned (and may never be.) Until they are condemned, he must be at peace with his fellow Catholics.

The Church has not condemned the Neocatechumenal heresy and may never condemn it for the objective of the new Rome is to keep unity at all costs, even if this "unity" means the destruction of our Creed/Faith. Think of this when you receive communion, that Rome has turned our act of communion into a farse, for with the approval and full backing of Rome we commune with heresy. Yea, be "at peace".

SJB · « **Reply #86 on:** March 06, 2011, 10:37:55 AM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Caraffa
Saying that "If the Church didn't specifically condemn something then it's to OK hold or even do" isn't very logical.

Jehanne wants things to be be condemned that are not condemned (and may never be.) Until they are condemned, he must be at peace with his fellow Catholics.

The Church has not condemned the Neocatechumenal heresy and may never condemn it for the objective of the new Rome is to keep unity at all costs, even if this "unity" means the destruction of our Creed/Faith. Think of this when you receive communion, that Rome has turned our act of communion into a farse, for with the approval and full backing of Rome we commune with heresy. Yea, be "at peace".

Are you unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II?

LM · « **Reply #87 on:** March 06, 2011, 10:45:56 AM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Caraffa
Saying that "If the Church didn't specifically condemn something then it's to OK hold or even do" isn't very logical.

Jehanne wants things to be be condemned that are not condemned (and may never be.) Until they are condemned, he must be at peace with his fellow Catholics.

The Church has not condemned the Neocatechumenal heresy and may never condemn it for the objective of the new Rome is to keep unity at all costs, even if this "unity" means the destruction of our Creed/Faith. Think of this when you receive communion, that Rome has turned our act of communion into a farse, for with the approval and full backing of Rome we commune with heresy. Yea, be "at peace".

Are you unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II?

Apparently its flown over your head that it was the pre-Vat II Church that gave us Vat II. Vat II didn't just pop up out of nothing.

SJB · « **Reply #88 on:** March 06, 2011, 12:06:26 PM »

Quote from: LM

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Caraffa
Saying that "If the Church didn't specifically condemn something then it's to OK hold or even do" isn't very logical.

Jehanne wants things to be be condemned that are not condemned (and may never be.) Until they are condemned, he must be at peace with his fellow Catholics.

The Church has not condemned the Neocatechumenal heresy and may never condemn it for the objective of the new Rome is to keep unity at all costs, even if this "unity" means the destruction of our Creed/Faith. Think of this when you receive communion, that Rome has turned our act of communion into a farse, for with the approval and full backing of Rome we commune with heresy. Yea, be "at peace".

Are you unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II?

Apparently its flown over your head that it was the pre-Vat II Church that gave us Vat II. Vat II didn't just pop up out of nothing.

Of course it didn't. But you still seem unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II.

LM · « **Reply #89 on:** March 06, 2011, 12:43:49 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: LM
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Caraffa
Saying that "If the Church didn't specifically condemn something then it's to OK hold or even do" isn't very logical.

Jehanne wants things to be be condemned that are not condemned (and may never be.) Until they are condemned, he must be at peace with his fellow Catholics.

The Church has not condemned the Neocatechumenal heresy and may never condemn it for the objective of the new Rome is to keep unity at all costs, even if this "unity" means the destruction of our Creed/Faith. Think of this when you receive communion, that Rome has turned our act of communion into a farse, for with the approval and full backing of Rome we commune with heresy. Yea, be "at peace".

Are you unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II?

Apparently its flown over your head that it was the pre-Vat II Church that gave us Vat II. Vat II didn't just pop up out of nothing.

Of course it didn't. But you still seem unable to differentiate between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II.

Don't fool yourself SJB. Vat II brought together from all corners , " ideologies" that had already/were invading Catholic thought. These "ideologies where "packaged" via a "council" to establish/cement them in. The post-VatII Church is the flourishing of seeds that found ground long, long ago, in the pre-VatII era. The source of post-VatII IS pre-VatII.