Nadie responds: You paint with a broad brush. So much for your theological books! You just posted a moronic comment. We are Catholic, doctrine to a Catholic is only Catholic Doctrine, not heresy or the "doctrines" of false religions.
Maybe we're misunderstanding each other.
Go and re-read what I wrote, and tell me what you are objecting to. I certainly didn't present the minimalist position as the doctrine of the Church. I stated clearly that the better theologians maintain that the doctrines of the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Redemption are also required explicitly to be believed in order for one to be saved.
A tolerated opinion is precisely one which may well be erroneous, but which the Church herself has not yet judged, and therefore she permits her future priests to be taught it in her seminaries.
That's right, and a tolerated opinion can be totally wrong. Even the unanimous opinion of theologians during a period of time can be totally wrong.
No, that's wrong. The whole Church cannot go wrong, and that is what would happen if all the approved teachers of her priests were permitted to teach false doctrine.
Yes, I understand that you know better than the Church, your powers of reason and yours standards of orthodoxy are higher than hers, but that's neither here nor there to anybody but you. The rest of us try to think with the Church.
My Church has clear dogmas revealed by the Holy Ghost, which I believe as they are written. Your Church has theological speculations, "tolerated" theories, that fit your own beliefs only through defying the law of non-contradiction at every turn.
No, you miss the point and bury it in bombast, as always. What is the Rule of Faith? The preaching of the Church. What is Nadie's rule of faith? His own archeological excavations in the Fathers, the Councils, the Popes.
Now, are you going to withdraw your Modernist theory about the evolution of dogma? Or are you going to let it stand there, scandalising anybody who might be foolish enough to believe something you write?
Topic: Feenyism (Read 12018 times)