Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name  (Read 15874 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name
« Reply #25 on: September 30, 2009, 07:00:04 PM »
Ugh, did it again!  Votum.  But, here's a wonderful definition:

http://www.online-dictionary.biz/latin/english/meaning/votum

votum:  prayer, wish, desire, vow, promise to god

Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name
« Reply #26 on: September 30, 2009, 07:11:25 PM »
For the record, I posted the CA response for humor's sake.

I'm against Feeneyism but not for the reasons in that post.


Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name
« Reply #27 on: September 30, 2009, 07:35:14 PM »
The Holy Office of Pius XII settled the Feeney issue in the 50's. Open and shut. It is amazing to me that his adherents still slam the door to Heaven to souls the Church does not.

Bottom line is that they indulge in private interpretation of a dogma that contradicts the Church's own interpretation.

Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name
« Reply #28 on: September 30, 2009, 07:54:16 PM »
Quote from: stevusmagnus
The Holy Office of Pius XII settled the Feeney issue in the 50's. Open and shut. It is amazing to me that his adherents still slam the door to Heaven to souls the Church does not.

Bottom line is that they indulge in private interpretation of a dogma that contradicts the Church's own interpretation.


They settled nothing; if anything, they excommunicated themselves.  What you are asking us to believe is that the Holy Spirit speaks with a forked tongue.  You are no different than the modernists at EWTN and CA.

Feeneyites and Sedes Give Trads a Bad Name
« Reply #29 on: September 30, 2009, 07:55:30 PM »
So the Holy Office excommunicated itself in excommunicating Fr. Feeney?