Just asked a question. Don't feel obliged to answer.
If there is no significance, explain why. If I am grasping at straws, explain why. If the semicolon exists for a purpose, what is it's purpose in this quote, and why is Mr. Ruby a liar?
When did I say he is a LIAR? There are differences between the word LIAR and the word DISHONEST. I said he is dishonest. His failure to use the full portion of Cantate Domino is dishonest, because the full text reduces his argument to nothing, whether he fully realizes it or not (also said he may just be blind).
Oh, wait...
No. I'm done debating you.
Very good! Why am I done debating you? Because your questions are completely irrelevant.
But let's play your little game for a second:
A semicolon has many uses. Often it separates to interdependent phrases. Whoopdy doo. :rolleyes:
IRRELEVANT because there is no semicolon in the Latin text of Florence. Go see for yourself (Tanner, Vol. 1, Part 17).
Frankly, you and your bad willed red herrings are quite simply pointless to keep dealing with. You've already rejected countless dogmatic decrees, without actually coming right out and saying so. You were unable to deny validity of my explanation of the rules of logic concerning the text of the Decree on Justification from Trent, though you tried and tried and fell into a critical blunder against logic in the process (logical NOR as a linguistic disjunction!).
You believe in and fight for heresy, despite the fact that logic itself is against you, and my epistemological judgment is that you are a formal heretic, on the road to hell. I hope you don't die like that.
Good day.