Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Immaculate Conception and BoD?  (Read 3836 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Immaculate Conception and BoD?
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2022, 11:58:10 AM »
Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 31, 2022, 11:42:22 AM
https://archive.org/details/ContraCrawfordBoD

I think this book addresses the question quite well. There is also this other book, which is nothing more than a list of sources teaching BoD. Don't know how one could deny hod is taught by the Magisterium. https://archive.org/details/SourcesOfBaptismOfBloodBaptismOfDesire

All those "sources" are thoroughly refuted ... here
https://schismatic-home-aloner.com/2nd_edition_final.pdf

and here ... https://catholicism.org/

This is the typical confirmation bias where the sources are marshalled in support of BoD by reading into them and interpreting them in such a way as to spin them as support for their pre-determined position.

Why is this posted in Anonymous?
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Immaculate Conception and BoD?
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2022, 12:00:10 PM »
Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 31, 2022, 03:31:43 AM
Somebody told me it is a sin to deny BoD because it was taught by the ordinary magisterium, just as it was a sin to err on Assumption or Immaculate Conception even before it was a dogma. She is a follower of the Sanborn group. 

If you disagree what would be your reasoning?

See Reply #7 above for why I disagree.

Speaking of Bishop Sanborn ... he rejects the necessity of explicit faith in Our Lord and the Holy Trinity for salvation.  But that was taught universally by the Church Fathers as well as by the entire Church for 1500 years.  What happened to the OUM for 1500 years?
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Immaculate Conception and BoD?
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2022, 04:06:21 PM »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »