Your posts could not possibly be more non-Catholic.... I absolutely cringe when I read them. We REALLY need that hide button back..
So what is it that prompted you to name this thread what you did - yet you did not post the dogma at all, certainly not as V1 infallibly decreed it, rather you chose to post a corrupted version?
You should cringe, the truth as taught by the Catholic Church always makes the liberals cringe, and you can only hide from the truth for so long, then comes the judgement.
The original post refers to a quote from "The Catechism Explained" (1899) - a very trusted Catholic resource with imprimatur. The quote simply refers the reader to several quotes from SCRIPTURE, which is where the dogma of infallibility of the Church ORIGINATES! Have you ever stopped and thought for one moment WHY the Church is called "the pillar and ground of truth" in Scripture ? ? ? ? Hint: there really IS a reason - take a wild guess!
I asked why did you not post the solemn definition of "the Church's infallibility" right from the First Vatican Council - I already know "The Catechism Explained (1899)" does NOT teach the same thing V1 decreed - rather than you proving me wrong by posting V1's solemn decree(s) on infallibility, you retort with more of your self inflicted aghasting mumbo jumbo.
Either show you have a modicuм of comprehension within you and
already post V1's solemn decrees dictating exactly what the Church's infallibility is, or go back and wallow in your site promoting the condemned "doctrine" of salvation via NSAA.
Again, "The Catechism Explained (1899)" is not citing or teaching the dogma of infallibility at all. "The Catechism Explained (1899)" cannot be reconciled with the dogma at all. IF "The Catechism Explained (1899)" was the dogma or taught the dogma, then the conciliar church is the Catholic Church -
but even you do not believe this, yet you promote the teaching from "The Catechism Explained (1899)" as if it is the infallible teaching of the Church, while COMPLETELY ignoring the actual solemnly defined decrees of V1. Are we to suppose your intentions are honest for doing this? Hmmmm?
We are in this crisis, in large part, because "The Catechism Explained (1899)" and the multitude of text books like it, all having imprimaturs, teach the same lie in some form - yet if it really is the dogma
as you say but don't believe yourself, then you only demonstrate that you have ABSOLUTELY NO FAITH AT ALL in the dogma because if you did, you would be (are?) a member of the conciliar church.