Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?  (Read 22556 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline umblehay anmay

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 378
  • Reputation: +28/-0
  • Gender: Male
Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
« on: May 25, 2014, 10:47:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #1 on: May 25, 2014, 10:51:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sorry... . meant to say,.... Does BOD "PROVIDE" the grace of Baptism


    Offline Mabel

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1893
    • Reputation: +1386/-25
    • Gender: Female
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #2 on: May 26, 2014, 12:00:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sorry, I don't click YouTube links unless I know what they are. I also don't listened to recordings or otherwise from unapproved sources on the matter.

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #3 on: May 27, 2014, 07:00:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • GJC, so are you saying that St. Alfonsus did not teach that a soul would have to go to purgatory?

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4579/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #4 on: May 27, 2014, 07:18:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Every Catholic dogma is exclusive, and admits of no interpretation contrary to that which it has received from the beginning. There is no need of Dimonds to explain this. The Church has infallibly declared that there is only one baptism for the remission of original sin and the entrance of Heaven and that is of water:

    Quote

    A. Council of Lateran IV, The Catholic Faith:

    The sacrament of Baptism, which at the invocation of God and the undivided
    Trinity, namely the Father the Son and The Holy Ghost, is solemnized in water, rightly conferred to anyone in the form of the Church is useful unto salvation.

    B. Council of Florence, Exaltate Domino (1439):

    Holy Baptism...holds the first place among the sacraments....the matter of this sacrament is real and natural water, it makes no difference warm or cold.

    C. Pope Innocent III, Non ut Apponeres (1206) EXCATHEDRA:

    In Baptism, two things are always and necessarily required, namely the words and the element (water)...You ought not to doubt that they do not have true Baptism in which one of them is missing.

    D. Council of Trent, Canons of Baptism (Canon 2)

    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Therefore BOD (and for catechumens ONLY) can only be theory that belongs to the realm of theological speculation, but never Catholic dogma. The matter for Baptism as given to us by CHRIST HIMSELF (see Jon 3:5) is true and natural WATER. There is only ONE baptism, not three. God would not contradict His own Word and Christ Lord expressly instituted the necessity of water Baptism for entrance into the Kingdom of Heaven. The Church also condemns anyone who holds that this could be optional:

    Quote

    Council of Trent, Canons of Baptism:

    If anyone says that the commandments of God are, even for a man who us justified, impossible to obtain let it be anathema.

    If anyone says that Baptism of optional, that is not necessary for salvation, let it be anathema.


    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline Ambrose

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3447
    • Reputation: +2429/-13
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #5 on: May 27, 2014, 09:39:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Mabel
    Sorry, I don't click YouTube links unless I know what they are. I also don't listened to recordings or otherwise from unapproved sources on the matter.


    Catholics are bound to avoid heretics and reject their teachings.  Catholics must not listen to anyone denying Catholic teaching on Baptism of Desire.

    Anyone who denies Baptism of Desire is professing heresy against the Catholic Faith.
    The Council of Trent, The Catechism of the Council of Trent, Papal Teaching, The Teaching of the Holy Office, The Teaching of the Church Fathers, The Code of Canon Law, Countless approved catechisms, The Doctors of the Church, The teaching of the Dogmatic

    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #6 on: May 29, 2014, 01:40:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: GJC
    Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Sorry... . meant to say,.... Does BOD "PROVIDE" the grace of Baptism



    Yes, now if you listen to these antagonists in Filmore N.Y. you may be confused by their straw man argument. I have listened to this recording which is filled with truths (when they quote the Church) and lies (when they give their opinions), which is the exact sign that identifies a modernist (enemy). St Pius X was crystal clear on this matter.

    The grace of Baptism/rebirth is the remission of the guilt of sin and remission of the temporal punishment due to every sin.

    St Thomas clearly teaches this, in respect to the remission of the guilt of sin:

    I answer that, As the Apostle says (Romans 6:3), "all we, who are baptized in Christ Jesus, are baptized in His death." And further on he concludes (Romans 6:11): "So do you also reckon that you are dead to sin, but alive unto God in Christ Jesus our Lord." Hence it is clear that by Baptism man dies unto the oldness of sin, and begins to live unto the newness of grace. But every sin belongs to the primitive oldness. Consequently every sin is taken away by Baptism.

    And in respect to the temporal punishment due to every sin, he explains:

    I answer that, As stated above (49, 3, ad 2; 68, 1,4,5) by Baptism a man is incorporated in the Passion and death of Christ, according to Romans 6:8: "If we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall live also together with Christ." Hence it is clear that the Passion of Christ is communicated to every baptized person, so that he is healed just as if he himself had suffered and died. Now Christ's Passion, as stated above (Question 68, Article 5), is a sufficient satisfaction for all the sins of all men. Consequently he who is baptized, is freed from the debt of all punishment due to him for his sins, just as if he himself had offered sufficient satisfaction for all his sins.

    Their bogus straw man argument will have you to think, (23:10 mark of the video), "That those theologians teach that BOD does not provide the grace of rebirth".

    The question is do we go to purgatory for venial sin when we die? I am sure you will say yes, provided they have not been atoned for in this world. Well a catechumen who has been justified by Baptism of Repentance, and has resolved to get Baptized will commit venial sins before receiving the sacrament. This is what the Saints are unfolding.

    The Dimonds are dangerous, mostly all of their commentary is the opposite of the truth, i.e. "The best argument against "Baptism of Desire", is actually the worst.


    The Dimonds answered to what you said.

    Here's their response:

    More Astounding Blindness from the ‘BOD’ Camp
     
    MHFM: An attempted response to the argument in our video, The Best Argument Against “Baptism of Desire”, recently came to our attention.  The response is so pathetic that it doesn’t even require a comment.  However, we felt that it provides an interesting example of how deluded and dishonest the defenders of heresy are.  The words below were written by a heretic named ‘GJC.’  Someone asked the heretic to answer the question we cover in the video: Does ‘BOD’ provide the grace of baptism?   In response to the question (and the argument in our video), he writes:
     
    Yes, now if you listen to these antagonists in Filmore N.Y. you may be confused by their straw man argument. I have listened to this recording which is filled with truths (when they quote the Church) and lies (when they give their opinions), which is the exact sign that identifies a modernist (enemy). St Pius X was crystal clear on this matter.

    The grace of Baptism/rebirth is the remission of the guilt of sin and remission of the temporal punishment due to every sin.

    St Thomas clearly teaches this, in respect to the remission of the guilt of sin:

    I answer that, As the Apostle says (Romans 6:3), "all we, who are baptized in Christ Jesus, are baptized in His death." And further on he concludes (Romans 6:11): "So do you also reckon that you are dead to sin, but alive unto God in Christ Jesus our Lord." Hence it is clear that by Baptism man dies unto the oldness of sin, and begins to live unto the newness of grace. But every sin belongs to the primitive oldness. Consequently every sin is taken away by Baptism.

    And in respect to the temporal punishment due to every sin, he explains:

    I answer that, As stated above (49, 3, ad 2; 68, 1,4,5) by Baptism a man is incorporated in the Passion and death of Christ, according to Romans 6:8: "If we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall live also together with Christ." Hence it is clear that the Passion of Christ is communicated to every baptized person, so that he is healed just as if he himself had suffered and died. Now Christ's Passion, as stated above (Question 68, Article 5), is a sufficient satisfaction for all the sins of all men. Consequently he who is baptized, is freed from the debt of all punishment due to him for his sins, just as if he himself had offered sufficient satisfaction for all his sins.

    Their bogus straw man argument will have you to think, (23:10 mark of the video), "That those theologians teach that BOD does not provide the grace of rebirth".

    The question is do we go to purgatory for venial sin when we die? I am sure you will say yes, provided they have not been atoned for in this world. Well a catechumen who has been justified by Baptism of Repentance, and has resolved to get Baptized will commit venial sins before receiving the sacrament. This is what the Saints are unfolding.

    The Dimonds are dangerous, mostly all of their commentary is the opposite of the truth…
     
    GJC

     
    MHFM: The statements above constitute a striking example of the incredible dishonesty and profound blindness of heretics.  Their dishonesty results in absolute idiocy.  To the question of whether ‘BAPTISM OF DESIRE’ supplies the grace of baptism, the fool (and he truly deserves that title) quotes something from St. Thomas in which St. Thomas teaches that Baptism itself provides the grace of baptism.  Yes, no one denies that St. Thomas taught that the Sacrament of Baptism itself provides the grace of baptism (which grace is the full remission of the guilt of sin and the temporal punishment due to every sin).  We are well aware of that fact.  The question is NOT: did St. Thomas teach that the Sacrament of Baptism provides the grace of baptism?  He of course did.   The question IS: does ‘BAPTISM OF DESIRE,’ as defined and explained by St. Thomas, St. Alphonsus, etc., provide the grace of baptism?  Of course, the answer is no, as the video proves.
     
    And since Trent defined that the grace of first justification is itself the grace of baptism (i.e., the remission of the guilt of every sin and the punishment owed for every sin) that proves that ‘baptism of desire’ cannot justify anyone and that it’s a false doctrine without any doubt.  In fact, if the heretic who attempted to respond to the argument and the question had any idea what he’s talking about – or if he even carefully watched the video (he probably lacked the humility to do so) – he would have discovered that theologians who favored the false doctrine of ‘BOD’ repeatedly taught that it does not provide the grace of baptism/spiritual rebirth.  Yet, even though our statement is 100% true, the heretic says that it’s a ‘bogus straw man argument’ to say they taught that ‘BOD’ doesn’t provide the grace of baptism!  Amazing.  It’s a clear example of how the obstinate proponents of ‘BOD’ are liars to the core.  They simply cannot tell the truth.  That’s why it’s almost impossible to get a heretic such as the one quoted above into an actual debate; for the nonsense and the lies they spread would be refuted in about two minutes.
     
    His paragraphs are a clear example how inept and (one must say) actually stupid evil people become as a consequence of hating the truth and hating those who promote it.  (His hatred of both is clear from his words.  That’s because he’s of Satan, and he’s of lies.)  In his blindness, he thinks that the promoters of Catholic truth are enemies of the faith.  That’s the punishment he has received from God for his dishonesty and bad will: to believe that the truth is evil, and that those who promote it are evil.  The reality is that he’s the one who is evil.  He’s the enemy of the faith and on the road to Hell.  That’s why he cannot even recognize the absurd arguments he’s advancing or the blatant lies he’s promoting.
     
    For example, in expanding upon his false argument, the heretic asserts that what St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus (in teaching ‘BOD’) are actually ‘unfolding’ is the idea that ‘baptism of desire’ does supply the grace of baptism (and the full remission of the temporal punishment due to sin); but that after receiving that grace (which includes the remission of the temporal punishment due to sin), one can live for a certain period of time and commit sins.  Then, at some later point in time, according to his summary of their position, the person can die and would have to suffer in Purgatory to satisfy for the sins committed after having received ‘Baptism of Desire.’  But that’s patent nonsense.  What he’s asserting is demonstrably false.
     
    St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus explicitly taught that ‘BOD’ does not provide the remission of the temporal punishment due to sin.  Thus, according to them, it doesn’t bring the grace of baptism.  Whether you think ‘baptism of desire’ (which doesn’t exist) occurs only at death (as some say) or during one’s life (as the heretic quoted above says) makes no difference to this point.  According to St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus, the change effectuated by ‘BOD’ (whenever you think it occurs) does not provide the remission of the temporal punishment due to sin.  It thus doesn’t provide the grace of baptism.  That’s what they taught, as their words prove.  (See the video).  Since the grace of first justification is the grace of baptism (which necessarily includes the remission of the temporal punishment due to every sin), and ‘baptism of desire’ doesn’t provide that, ‘baptism of desire’ is infallibly a false doctrine.
     
    So, in his futile attempt to answer the question and defend his completely false position, the heretic has resorted to blatantly lying about what the saints taught.  That’s why the argument/question posed in the video is so effective and devastating.
     
    If people even try to address it, they will undoubtedly contradict Catholic dogma, contradict themselves, contradict their arguments, contradict the people they cite, utter blatant lies, etc.  That’s because they don’t have the truth.

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #7 on: May 29, 2014, 10:09:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, GJC . . . Sneakytricks posted that reply by the Dimonds.  How do you respond?  As the Dimonds pointed out, you made the assertion that St. Thomas believed that BOD supplied the grace of Baptism, and then posted a quote from him that the Sacrament of Baptism supplies that Grace... that's why I couldn't respond, because your post was so confusing I couldn't even understand it.


    Offline Sneakyticks

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 290
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #8 on: May 29, 2014, 11:56:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • According to Pope Leo XIII the most that laymen are allowed to be are faithful echoes of the teaching of the Church, but the Dimonds think that they can be self-appointed theologians and make up and invent their own conclusions and teachings, on matters already settled, and then dare to bind people to their self-made new teachings under pain of damnation, and all this without any theological training whatsoever.

    They think that they can impose upon themselves the mission and task theologians receive from the Church of teaching and forming conclusions etc.

    What can they say of their blatant disregard for these basic principles? Are they unaware that a mere layman with no mission from the Church can't decide one day to come up with his own teachings and then presume and dare to say what he says he "found" is the truth, going against what the Church Itself teaches? Don't they know this is going down the beaten path of heretics?

    They seem to be checking out this forum so if you are reading this Dimonds, let's hear it.


    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #9 on: June 01, 2014, 10:14:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Trent session 6, CHAPTER III.
    Who are justified through Christ.
    "But, though He died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His [Page 32] death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated. For as in truth men, if they were not born propagated of the seed of Adam, would not be born unjust,-seeing that, by that propagation, they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own,-so, if they were not born again in Christ, they never would be justified; seeing that, in that new birth, there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace whereby they are made just...."
     
    Trent Session 5, On Original Sin #5
    "...For, in those who are born again, there is nothing that God hates; because, There is no condemnation to those who are truly buried together with Christ by baptism into death; who walk not according to the flesh, but, putting off the old man, and putting on the new who is created according to God, are made innocent, immaculate, pure, harmless, and beloved of God, heirs indeed of God, but joint heirs with Christ; so that there is nothing whatever to retard their entrance into heaven.



    So were St. Alfonsus and St. Thomas correct that a person could receive BOD and still possibly need to go to purgatory?

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #10 on: June 02, 2014, 09:32:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Does a person HAVE to be "born again in Christ" or NOT????

    BOD supporters please answer this


    Offline obertray imondday

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 109
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #11 on: June 02, 2014, 10:56:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Could you be more spesific?

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #12 on: June 03, 2014, 01:30:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: obertray imondday
    Could you be more spesific?


    Trent session 6, CHAPTER III.
     Who are justified through Christ.
     "But, though He died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His [Page 32] death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated. For as in truth men, if they were not born propagated of the seed of Adam, would not be born unjust,-seeing that, by that propagation, they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own,-so, if they were not born again in Christ, they never would be justified; seeing that, in that new birth, there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace whereby they are made just...."


    How much more "specific" do you need?

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46864
    • Reputation: +27735/-5150
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #13 on: June 03, 2014, 02:39:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Trent session 6, CHAPTER III.
    Who are justified through Christ.
    "But, though He died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His [Page 32] death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated. For as in truth men, if they were not born propagated of the seed of Adam, would not be born unjust,-seeing that, by that propagation, they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own,-so, if they were not born again in Christ, they never would be justified; seeing that, in that new birth, there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace whereby they are made just...."
     
    Trent Session 5, On Original Sin #5
    "...For, in those who are born again, there is nothing that God hates; because, There is no condemnation to those who are truly buried together with Christ by baptism into death; who walk not according to the flesh, but, putting off the old man, and putting on the new who is created according to God, are made innocent, immaculate, pure, harmless, and beloved of God, heirs indeed of God, but joint heirs with Christ; so that there is nothing whatever to retard their entrance into heaven.



    So were St. Alfonsus and St. Thomas correct that a person could receive BOD and still possibly need to go to purgatory?


    Clearly St. Alphonsus and St. Thomas were very much mistaken.  This logic is impeccable, a simple syllogism.

    1) There can be no justification without being reborn.
    2) Those who have been reborn have nothing in them to "retard their entrance into heaven".

    ERGO, St. Alphonsus and St. Thomas were clearly WRONG.

    There simply is no refutation for this, other than the Bill Clinton "depends on what your meaning of 'is' is".

    What this means is that St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus, the chief "heavyweights" cited as authorities in support of BoD, suddenly lose credibility on the subject because their explanation of it is completely wrong and contrary to Church teaching.  That's why this rocks the world of BoD.

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Does BOD proved the grace of baptism?
    « Reply #14 on: June 03, 2014, 09:43:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Trent session 6, CHAPTER III.
    Who are justified through Christ.
    "But, though He died for all, yet do not all receive the benefit of His [Page 32] death, but those only unto whom the merit of His passion is communicated. For as in truth men, if they were not born propagated of the seed of Adam, would not be born unjust,-seeing that, by that propagation, they contract through him, when they are conceived, injustice as their own,-so, if they were not born again in Christ, they never would be justified; seeing that, in that new birth, there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace whereby they are made just...."
     
    Trent Session 5, On Original Sin #5
    "...For, in those who are born again, there is nothing that God hates; because, There is no condemnation to those who are truly buried together with Christ by baptism into death; who walk not according to the flesh, but, putting off the old man, and putting on the new who is created according to God, are made innocent, immaculate, pure, harmless, and beloved of God, heirs indeed of God, but joint heirs with Christ; so that there is nothing whatever to retard their entrance into heaven.



    So were St. Alfonsus and St. Thomas correct that a person could receive BOD and still possibly need to go to purgatory?


    Clearly St. Alphonsus and St. Thomas were very much mistaken.  This logic is impeccable, a simple syllogism.

    1) There can be no justification without being reborn.
    2) Those who have been reborn have nothing in them to "retard their entrance into heaven".

    ERGO, St. Alphonsus and St. Thomas were clearly WRONG.

    There simply is no refutation for this, other than the Bill Clinton "depends on what your meaning of 'is' is".

    What this means is that St. Thomas and St. Alphonsus, the chief "heavyweights" cited as authorities in support of BoD, suddenly lose credibility on the subject because their explanation of it is completely wrong and contrary to Church teaching.  That's why this rocks the world of BoD.



    Could any BOD supporters address this please?