Lad: Yes, it's, (i.e. Lefebvre's position on EENS) a grave error, an almost word-for-word contradiction of the Church's dogmatic definitions of EENS.
struth: Look hollingsworth, Catholics believe in dogma and not in fallible men. And you cry like a heathen "oh vey, they touched my idols". Grow up!
OK, we've got two of you on record. Where's NO? Laddy says that ABL was in "grave error." And struth believes in dogma, not fallible men like ABL. What a champion of the faith he is!
How about you, Matthew? Do you take a similar position? Are you in the camp of these two theological CI giants? Do you reject "fallible men" like the Archbishop, while declaring unyielding, unwavering allegiance to true "dogma?" This is your blog. You reprint everything that +Williamson writes, who, along with the other bishops I am certain, holds the erroneous views of ABL. Where do you stand, sir? After all, you say this is a Resistance site, and +W is the putative leader of that Resistance. How about it?