We yammer about it, because you Feeneyites keep bringing it up and dishonestly try to say that we say invincible ignorance gives salvation. If you would stop dishonestly yammering in the first place it could be done with.
Look who the dishonest one is:
Someone who is in good faith in his errors, does NOT mean that he could be saved BY that system of errors, but in spite of them.
Then you have the superior temerity to accuse Pius IX of supporting your Pelagian heresy. However, YOU who are hoodwinked by the modernist clergy you follow, and I suspect I know who they are based on your quote, don't have the slightest clue what Pius IX is communicating when he uses the words "can...attain" salvation, since you have no clue of what "sufficient grace" means and the issues Pius IX contended with from the Jansenists and Calvinists at that time. Not to mention the more important issue of liberals'/modernists'/heretics' which you have fell in line with.
Apparently you don't even know what "in spite of" means. Go look it up.
Of course I do, who are you trying to be now? Cill Blinton
He was saved in spite of his ignorance. Period! That is what you are saying.
I said "system of errors" and now you turn it into "ignorance"!! You cannot even get something as simple as this straight right here, never mind understanding perennial teaching.