Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12

Author Topic: Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni  (Read 22986 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline andy

Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni
« on: July 02, 2021, 09:18:04 PM »
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2021, 09:22:35 PM »
That makes me even more convinced of the Feeneyite position ... 
Logged

Offline Stanley N

Re: Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2021, 11:07:48 PM »
Why?
Logged

Online Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2021, 06:00:14 AM »
He fits this to a "T".....

"Almost everybody who writes or comments on this subject explains the doctrine by explaining it away, as we shall see further on. He begins by affirming the truth of the axiom, Extra Ecciesiam, etc., and ends by denying it - while continuing to insist vigorously that he is not doing so". - Fr. Wathen, Who Shall Ascend?
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Crisis Series #31 w/ Fr. Robinson: The Feeneyite Error - Overreacting to Moderni
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2021, 06:26:20 AM »
Quote from: Stanley N on July 02, 2021, 11:07:48 PM
Why?

Just because it’s coming from Fr. Robinson.

I’ll analyze it here later.

He starts by characterizing it as an “overreaction” just like sedevacantism.  That simply assumes it’s wrong out of the gate and somehow based on emotional rather than theological considerations.  I’m sure the SSPX holds the Resistance also to be overreaction.  Anything that is to the right of their compromise position, where they deliberately sit on the fence between Tradition and the Conciliar Church they brush off as overreaction.  Perhaps theirs is an underreaction.

Then he cites the Church’s “condemnation” in Suprema Haec.  So he gives more weight to this dubious letter that was never published by the Vatican ... but only by Fr. Feeney’s chief nemesis ... as being more authoritative than an Ecuмenical Council?  If the latter could contain error, then a fortiori so could SH.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
« previous next »