Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
No, it is not related to their punishment, which isn't mentioned. It says they do not have "life." Yes, they do not have "life" in Christ:"It would hardly be inconsistent for him to consign infants to positive punishments."The "it would hardly be inconsistent for him" is not a basis for ascribing actual belief of a position to St. Augustine or anyone else. Take a moment to think about the absurdity of such a claim. This thread concerns what St. Augustine said and affirmed about the punishment of infants who die without baptism.
No, it is not related to their punishment, which isn't mentioned.
I acknowledged that.
There's nothing wrong with my post.
This gives us an insight into Augustine's mind - he does not shy away from harsh doctrine. It would hardly be inconsistent for him to consign infants to positive punishments.
He taught the eternal suffering of unregenerate infants, because he thought it a necessary consequence from the doctrine of original sin . . .The infant child, although born in original sin, and therefore degenerate from its archetype of perfection, is thus, according to St. Augustine, worthy of love and reverence as a work of God. It has no actual and personal sin, and if it dies, is forever incapable of committing any sin and incurring any demerit. Its eternal separation from God as the chief good, as we have already said, involved in the mind of St. Augustine the necessity of suffering. He admits this necessity however with evident repugnance, endeavors to soften it down as much as possible, and evidently would be glad to escape from it altogether. An able expositor of his doctrine on this point in modern times, Antoine, explains this suffering of infants dying in original sin as levis tristitia.