CathInfo.com

So LoT returns to self-bump all his old threads that no one cared about in the first place.

His Holiness Pope Saint Pius X, in his Encyclical Pascendi (On Modernism) had already explained the problem, namely that Modernism (which is exactly what the "liberalism" was) did not merely attack some one single doctrine but was indifference, a kind of erosion that damaged all doctrines more or less equally. And if there was any problem with the Catholicism of Boston in the Post-war period, it was this universal erosion of all doctrines. Out of all that why pick one, unless by doing so it enables one to coin some pithy and short slogan, and perhaps also to provide a focal point at which to attack. This would be taking on not all of Modernism, but only the erosion it has caused on some one single doctrinal point, while leaving all other doctrinal points eroded. Far more likely he already knew which doctrine he was going to make a deal of, and the only question was how long to keep it under wraps until the most propitious time to bring it forth.