Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error  (Read 20970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error
« Reply #70 on: October 09, 2009, 11:10:22 AM »
Quote from: SJB
There is no conflict here. Because you believe you actually are a theologian, you've convinced yourself that there is a conflict. It's so obvious to you...yet nobody else ever noticed it. You have no humility, Jehanne...or you're just really stupid.

I do hope, for your sake, it's the latter.


Wow, I had to read this one twice.  No doubt you have heard of Father Feeney, no?

Offline SJB

1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error
« Reply #71 on: October 09, 2009, 12:15:43 PM »
Quote from: Jehanne
Quote from: SJB
There is no conflict here. Because you believe you actually are a theologian, you've convinced yourself that there is a conflict. It's so obvious to you...yet nobody else ever noticed it. You have no humility, Jehanne...or you're just really stupid.

I do hope, for your sake, it's the latter.


Wow, I had to read this one twice.  No doubt you have heard of Father Feeney, no?


Yes, and I have no reason to attack him. But he is hardly a significant figure in the resistance to Vatican II. In your world, he died a heretic. Isn't that right?


1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error
« Reply #72 on: October 09, 2009, 01:28:19 PM »
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Jehanne
Quote from: SJB
There is no conflict here. Because you believe you actually are a theologian, you've convinced yourself that there is a conflict. It's so obvious to you...yet nobody else ever noticed it. You have no humility, Jehanne...or you're just really stupid.

I do hope, for your sake, it's the latter.


Wow, I had to read this one twice.  No doubt you have heard of Father Feeney, no?


Yes, and I have no reason to attack him. But he is hardly a significant figure in the resistance to Vatican II. In your world, he died a heretic. Isn't that right?


Not sure where you got that one from?!  As everyone knows, Father Feeney died in full communion with the Church.

Offline SJB

1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error
« Reply #73 on: October 09, 2009, 01:48:06 PM »
Quote from: Jehanne
Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Jehanne
Quote from: SJB
There is no conflict here. Because you believe you actually are a theologian, you've convinced yourself that there is a conflict. It's so obvious to you...yet nobody else ever noticed it. You have no humility, Jehanne...or you're just really stupid.

I do hope, for your sake, it's the latter.


Wow, I had to read this one twice.  No doubt you have heard of Father Feeney, no?


Yes, and I have no reason to attack him. But he is hardly a significant figure in the resistance to Vatican II. In your world, he died a heretic. Isn't that right?


Not sure where you got that one from?!  As everyone knows, Father Feeney died in full communion with the Church.


Pius XII was a heretic...but Fr. Feeney died in "full communion" with the Church?

Does anybody else want to comment on this?

1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error
« Reply #74 on: October 09, 2009, 02:10:01 PM »
Quote from: SJB
Pius XII was a heretic...but Fr. Feeney died in "full communion" with the Church?

Does anybody else want to comment on this?


I am sure that CM will want to comment!  Pius XII denied infallible Catholic dogma which Father Feeney affirmed.  Not the first time in the history of the Church, just consider Pope John XXII.