Are you suggesting St. Alphonsus called into question a previously solemnly defined dogma?

I am asking whether you think he objectively did or not.

Are you suggesting that I'm suggesting St. Alphonsus knowingly taught something that was contrary to Trent?

If you can reconcile what Trent teaches with St. Alphonsus' definition of BOD, by all means go ahead. I am willing to learn

[CANON IV.-If any one saith, that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary unto salvation, but superfluous; and that, without them, or without the desire thereof, men obtain of God, through faith alone, the grace of justification;-though all (the sacraments) are not indeed necessary for every individual; let him be anathema.[

11.  Can. 4:  Si quis dixerit sacramenta novae legis non esse ad salutem necessaria, sed superflua; et sine eis aut eorum voto per solam fidem homines a Deo gratiam justificationis adipisci, licet omnia singulis necessaria non siut, anathema sit."

12.  The heretics say that no sacrament is necessary, inasmuch as they hold that man is justified by faith alone, and that the sacraments only serve to excite and nourish this faith, which (as they say) can be equally excited and nourished by preaching.  But this is certainly false, and is condemned in the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth canons:  for as we know from the Scriptures, some of the sacraments are necessary (necessitate Medii) as a means without which salvation is impossible. Thus Baptism is necessary for all, Penance for them who have fallen into sin after Baptism, and the Eucharist is necessary for all at least in desire ( in voto)

Really means that much to you, huh?

If you can reconcile what Trent teaches with St. Alphonsus' definition of BOD, by all means go ahead. I am willing to learn

So glad you are ready to learn.

Baptism of Desire occurs either by an explicit desire to receive the Sacrament (as in a Catechumen) or an implicit desire contained in a resolve to fulfill God’s will (as in the Invincibly Ignorant).

Once this desire is formed—provided it is animated by Perfect Charity (love of God above all things) and Perfect Contrition—the soul is justified by God's Grace immediately, even before the physical reception of the Sacrament.

This is exactly analogous to the doctrine of Perfect Contrition, where a penitent is absolved of sin before entering the confessional, precisely because their contrition includes the resolve to receive the Sacrament as soon as possible."

You can't reconcile it? Which means you think it doubts previously defined solemn dogma? Please answer what you think.

Please, just speak, "Yea, yea, neah, neah" as the Scripture tells us. Do you think St. Alphonsus called into doubt with his wording a previously declared solemn dogma?