Both Wathen and Feeney were dead when Laisney wrote that, so how can they refute something that was invented by Laisney after they were dead? Your OP request has been thoroughly responded to here from other sources, is it that you do not believe what everyone is telling you, or that you do not want to believe anything they are telling you? Either way it sounds like it is a waste of time to answer you, for you have already made up your mind and no one is going to change it.
Fr. Wathen responded to Fr. Laisney in “Who Shall Ascend?” regarding objections made in the latter’s prototype work that eventually became “Is Feeneyism Catholic?” So my request is not illogical in its presumption that it is possible that this objection was answered in a source that I am unaware of.
Secondly the only person in this thread who has responded using a rebuttal to the concerns did not “use other sources” but used arguments deduced as a counterpart to Fr. Laisney’s arguments.
Thirdly, how can you assume to know what I believe regarding this matter? In point of fact, I do not believe in Baptism of Desire nor in Baptism of Blood.
My interest in the matter stems from knowing if Fr. Feeney or Fr. Wathen or someone along those lines like the MICM was/is aware of this objection and has written on it.