Just answer the question. What do the great Doctors of the Church say that Pius IX rrreeeaaally meant at The First Vatican Council when he infallibly decreed: "Hence, too, that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding."

If you cannot or if you will not answer the question, just say so, but at least acknowledge you have no idea how to answer or that you've at least read the question.

The topic is Trent said you are anathema for saying the sacrament is not necessary unto salvation.

You say the sacrament is not necessary because some of the great Doctors said as much.

So you completely surrender your brain and any reading comprehension to oppose what Trent said clearly and wholly reject what V1 decreed for absolutely no reason - and no, the mistaken speculations of some of the great Doctors does not give you a free pass to promote your heresies. But I'm sorry to say that one thing is certain - you'll find that out soon enough.

… and the "truth" LIES and lay with its "lover"

Excellent refutation.

[size={defaultattr}]
Does that sound familiar to you?

That was the question.  How is the question wrong?[/size]

The "different implication" is the difference between doctrine and heresy.  Incredible.  Do you even believe yourself?

No heresy at all ... except in your positions.  Denial of BoD is NOT heresy by any stretch of the imagination.  Pelagianism IS heresy, so is denial of EENS, so is your ecclesiology, and so is your rejection of the dogma that the Sacraments are necessary for salvation.