Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: BumphreyHogart = Nado  (Read 2676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41890
  • Reputation: +23939/-4344
  • Gender: Male
BumphreyHogart = Nado
« on: March 19, 2017, 07:52:16 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
    • Nado has now re-emerged as BumphreyHogart.  Nado was very fond of trying to insult me by calling out my real name, and Bumphrey, whom I have long suspected of being none other than Nado, finally couldn't help himself and just did the same thing.  Bumphrey also promotes the same Nadonian absurdity of "negative infallibility" (something that almost no one believes even among the most rabid dogmatic sedevacantists) ... that it's impossible that the Church could ever FAIL to condemn any error whatsoever.  Case closed.  Nado was banned for directly insulting Matthew and for promoting a rabid dogmatic sedevacantism.
    Logged

    Offline BumphreyHogart

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +226/-662
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #1 on: March 20, 2017, 06:43:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!4
    • Typical tactics, always suspecting someone of being someone else. I think it's some type of psychological coping to force yourself to think there are fewer opponents of Feeneyism, and as if hardly anyone can think similarly. Apparently LoT and Nado must have given you a run for your money because you keep bringing those names up.

    Trying to insult you? Believe me, if I wanted to insult you I wouldn't merely state your name! No, I wasn't trying to insult you; I am trying to make you more responsible in your carryings-on here.

    The "Nadonian absurdity of "negative infallibility""? You are the one alone who made up that term! And you even have the notion that just because you haven't heard sedevacantists express themselves in such a manner that it means they don't believe it?? That is not even logical.

    Lastly, I never said it is impossible that the Church could ever fail to condemn "any error whatsoever". Bad memory? or just dishonest?

    It is not beneath you to go against past approved Catholic publications, but if you look up the infallibility of the believing Church, all Catholics surely believe it.

    Logged
    "there can be no holiness where there is disagreement with the pope" - Pope St. Pius X

    Today, only Catholics holding the sedevacantist position are free from the anguish entailed by this truth.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #2 on: March 20, 2017, 08:07:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: BumphreyHogart on March 20, 2017, 06:43:38 AM
    I think it's some type of psychological coping to force yourself to think there are fewer opponents of Feeneyism, and as if hardly anyone can think similarly.
    That's utterly ridiculous.  We're obviously keenly aware of the fact that ours is the minority opinion these days.  We're not complete idiots.  90%+ of Traditional Catholics believe in BoD, and many of them consider Feeneyites to be "heretics", and many of them promote one heresy or another in their promotion of BoD.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #3 on: March 20, 2017, 08:08:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Nice try, Nado.  We know that it's you.

    :laugh1:
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #4 on: March 20, 2017, 08:10:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: BumphreyHogart on March 20, 2017, 06:43:38 AM
    Apparently LoT and Nado must have given you a run for your money because you keep bringing those names up.
    LoT is mentioned because he's spent the most time in this little sub-forum promoting BoD.

    Nado was nothing more than an immature intellectually-challenged irritant.  By contrast, LoT was a breath of fresh air because he at least understood most of the theological principles involved.
    Logged

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #5 on: March 20, 2017, 08:31:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Ladislaus on March 20, 2017, 08:08:32 AM
    Nice try, Nado.  We know that it's you.

    :laugh1:
    Yes, we know bh is actually the Nado. Same anti-Catholic beliefs, although not surprisingly, he's gotten himself more confused, it's plain to see he is Nada.
    Logged
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse

    Offline BumphreyHogart

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +226/-662
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #6 on: March 20, 2017, 10:42:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Looks like you guys now have another tool in your toolbox for diversion from the issues!
    Logged
    "there can be no holiness where there is disagreement with the pope" - Pope St. Pius X

    Today, only Catholics holding the sedevacantist position are free from the anguish entailed by this truth.

    Offline FlatEarthInquisitor

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 73
    • Reputation: +38/-40
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #7 on: March 20, 2017, 10:44:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • great work guys. Good to see the spirit of the Holy Inquisition is alive.

     Root them out wherever they are!

    AMDG!
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #8 on: March 20, 2017, 10:46:26 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Not only is Nado masquerading as Bumphrey, but he's also masquerading as a Catholic.  Neither is very convincing.

    :laugh1:
    Logged

    Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 127
    • Reputation: +74/-89
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #9 on: March 20, 2017, 10:50:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • so if he knows who you are, does that mean that you know who he is?
    We do too.
    Logged

    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +765/-544
    • Gender: Female
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #10 on: March 20, 2017, 11:00:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
    • Is this a bar fight?

    :cheers:

    :facepalm:

    :jester:
    Logged

    Offline Gregory I

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1542
    • Reputation: +659/-108
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #11 on: March 20, 2017, 02:28:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: BumphreyHogart on March 20, 2017, 06:43:38 AM
    Typical tactics, always suspecting someone of being someone else. I think it's some type of psychological coping to force yourself to think there are fewer opponents of Feeneyism, and as if hardly anyone can think similarly. Apparently LoT and Nado must have given you a run for your money because you keep bringing those names up.

    Trying to insult you? Believe me, if I wanted to insult you I wouldn't merely state your name! No, I wasn't trying to insult you; I am trying to make you more responsible in your carryings-on here.

    The "Nadonian absurdity of "negative infallibility""? You are the one alone who made up that term! And you even have the notion that just because you haven't heard sedevacantists express themselves in such a manner that it means they don't believe it?? That is not even logical.

    Lastly, I never said it is impossible that the Church could ever fail to condemn "any error whatsoever". Bad memory? or just dishonest?

    It is not beneath you to go against past approved Catholic publications, but if you look up the infallibility of the believing Church, all Catholics surely believe it.
    That's not a denial.
    Logged
    'Take care not to resemble the multitude whose knowledge of God's will only condemns them to more severe punishment.'

    -St. John of Avila

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #12 on: March 20, 2017, 02:30:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41890
    • Reputation: +23939/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #13 on: March 20, 2017, 02:46:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • As I said, Nado was the only poster here on CI who liked calling me out by my real name ... until Bumphrey.  And Bumphrey's positions (including the very unique negative infallibility position), thinking, and posting style are so uncannily similar to Nado's, that it's very clear that Nado has signed up again as Bumphrey.
    Logged

    Offline Stubborn

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13825
    • Reputation: +5568/-865
    • Gender: Male
    Re: BumphreyHogart = Nado
    « Reply #14 on: March 20, 2017, 02:52:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Yep.
    Logged
    "But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God, rather than men." - Acts 5:29

    The Highest Principle in the Church: "We are first of all under obedience to God, and only then under obedience to man" - Fr. Hesse
    Pages: [1] 2 3
    « previous next »