Boy have you changed since your first post here seven years ago. What you considered a mind-frame that pretty much destroyed your vocation to the priesthood, you now have a cup over-flowing with!
"I believe in allowing a certain amount of latitude around the diabolical disorientation which has infested the Church. I have my opinions of course but don't feel as though anyone who disagrees with me should be therefore condemned as a heretic. Unfortunately, I got into that mindset under Father Sanborn, and that pretty much destroyed my vocation to the priesthood."
Again, what your feeble (and heretically depraved) mind fails to comprehend is that I do not condemn BoD/BoB as heretical. You and bosco both persist in slandering me with this accusation. What I condemn as heretical are nothing other than things that the Church has condemned as heretical.
1) Pelagianism -- heretical or not?
2) that the Sacrament of Baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation -- heretical or not?
3) Protestant invisible Church ecclesiology -- heretical or not?
4) declaring that non-Catholics can be saved -- heretical or not?
You promote all these heresies. You are a vile heretic of the first order. And, by your own dogmatic sedevacantist principles, you are a manifest heretic and therefore outside the Church.
With my quotation, I am referring to disputed questions that have not been settled by the authority of the Church. So, for instance, there are several uncondemned opinions regarding what happens to a
Papa Haereticus, yet the dogmatic sedevacantists elevate their position to the level of dogma. BoB/BoD are disputed questions.
I am obviously not referring to questions that have been settled by the Church. So, for instance, if you were go go around denying the Immaculate Conception or Papal Infallibility, I would condemn you as a heretic. If you deny EENS, you are a heretic. If you reject the necessity of the Sacraments for salvation, you are a heretic. If you promote Protestant ecclesiology, you're a heretic. You know, it's very ironic that the FIRST thing that most sedevacantists respond when asked what's "heretical" in Vatican II is "subsistence" ecclesiology. But YOU Cushingites ALL hold subsistence ecclesiology.