Her work was continually contested by demonic forces? You mean learned Thomistic theologians that didn't opine on it in the same way you do? I was just stating that due to it's controversy by legitimate authorities (with also a valid basis to find issue) it wouldn't be exactly safe. Something which is obvious since others say you have to take caution when reading it lol. Also, she wasn't ever beatified (even by v2 antipopes from what I can tell) so I'm not sure why you're calling her blessed. And the condemnation, by the way, WAS effective in Spain, it was just suspended for Charles II.
There were certain copies printed in various languages that were condemned because they had errors in them. The original was not condemned from what I understand. I will create a thread and share the "Approbations" from the introduction to the book in its own thread in a few minutes.
Bishop Sanborn had at one time condemned the writings of Ven. Mary of Agreda's City of God and told a friend of mine not to read it because it was condemned. After I shared the Approbations with her from my old copy and she shared it with him, he stopped criticizing it from what I understand.