Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 19

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites  (Read 14919 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites
« Reply #65 on: April 26, 2026, 01:50:07 AM »
Quote from: AnthonyPadua on April 26, 2026, 01:47:57 AM
Is it possible Tom and Maria are the same person? I have always found Maria 'off' as she is listed as a female yet her arguments tend to be more on the male side of things.

Feeneyism frying your brain bro
Logged

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites
« Reply #66 on: April 26, 2026, 01:51:07 AM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on April 25, 2026, 03:39:00 PM
My goodness what a word salad.

That does everything except actually respond to the points made.
>lad responds to point
>cries that he didn't respond to the point
>claims other cry
Hmmmm OI VEY!
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites
« Reply #67 on: April 26, 2026, 01:54:35 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on April 25, 2026, 10:46:19 PM
So, not only is the rejection of something that's "theologically certain" not heresy, but the theological note is also just opinion.  Most of Father Cekada's list did not even qualify it as theologically certain.



You write a lot, but are not very intelligent.

I know of no theological point that has received so many notes of certainty and yet there are some people insisting on calling themselves Catholic by disputing it.

What theologians challenged it before VII? None. Because they would have been excommunicated.
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites
« Reply #68 on: April 26, 2026, 01:55:44 AM »
Quote from: AnthonyPadua on April 26, 2026, 01:51:07 AM
>lad responds to point
>cries that he didn't respond to the point
>claims other cry
Hmmmm OI VEY!


He didn't respond the point though, did he.
Logged

Offline AnthonyPadua

  • Supporter
Re: Bishop Williamson on Feeneyites
« Reply #69 on: April 26, 2026, 01:56:17 AM »
Quote from: Maria Dolorosa on April 25, 2026, 03:41:10 PM
These theological distinctions are obvious to one who is educated in the Catholic Faith. The Magisterium must be read in light of the Magisterium and in light of proper catechesis.

Baptism of desire is baptism.

God takes the will for the deed. Prove me wrong on that point. NO ONE has addressed this.

Ceremonial things are usually formalities.
BoD is NOT baptism, this is just ridiculous. Baptism has MATTER and FORM for it to be VALID. BoD has neither. Matter and Form are NOT Ceremonies.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 19
« previous next »