Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Baptismofdesire.com  (Read 54164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lover of Truth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8700
  • Reputation: +1159/-864
  • Gender: Male
Re: Baptismofdesire.com
« Reply #705 on: August 07, 2017, 02:23:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Dogma of Infallibility

    It is a dogma of the Catholic Church that the Church is divinely kept from the possibility of error in her definitive teaching on faith and morals.

    Definition of “Infallibility” from “A Catholic Dictionary”, 1951: "This infallibility resides (A) in the pope personally and alone; (B) in an ecuмenical Council subject to papal confirmation (these infallibilities are distinct but correlative); (C) in the bishops of the Church, dispersed throughout the world, teaching definitively in union with the pope. This is not a different infallibility from (B) but is the ordinary exercise of a prerogative (hence called the "ordinary magisterium") which is manifested in a striking manner in an ecuмenical Council. This ordinary magisterium is exercised by pastoral letters, preaching, catechisms, the censorship of publications dealing with faith and morals, the reprobation of doctrines and books: it is thus in continuous function and embraces the whole deposit of faith."

    The Catholic Encyclopedia (1917) in the article on Infallibility, states the same: "Three Organs of Infallibility: 1. the bishops dispersed throughout the world in union with the Holy See (exercised by what theologians describe as the ordinarium magisterium, i. e. the common or everyday teaching authority of the Church), 2. ecuмenical councils under the headship of the pope; and 3. the pope himself separately.

    So these definitions coincide with the magisterium definitions above.

    In other words, teaching from the Ordinary Magisterium continually occurs throughout the Church century after century, and the decisions of Popes and Councils (Solemn Magisterium) confine what is taught through the ordinary teaching. Both solemn and ordinary teaching of the Church are considered infallible by this definition. The infallibility of both Solemn and Ordinary Magisterium was solemnly defined by the First Vatican Council (1870) when it stated the following:

    "All those things are to be believed by divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the written Word of God or in Tradition, and which are proposed by the Church, either in solemn judgment or in its ordinary and universal teaching office, as divinely revealed truths which must be believed."

    In other words, both forms of the Magisterium of the Church (Solemn or Ordinary) are infallible and must be believed, according to this General Council. So if a teaching in the Church is universal, and allowed to propagate without condemnation from the Solemn Magisterium, it is considered infallible by the First Vatican Council. Next we provide examples of such teaching from both solemn and ordinary teaching of the Church on the subject of the threefold Baptism.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3723/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #706 on: August 07, 2017, 06:09:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Or............Salvationoutsideofthechurch.com


    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2106
    • Reputation: +1065/-205
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #707 on: August 11, 2023, 06:50:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is this thread I have stumbled into and why does it go from 2013 to 2017 and is 48 pages? I don't want to read all of this.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3162
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #708 on: August 11, 2023, 06:54:20 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is this thread I have stumbled into and why does it go from 2013 to 2017 and is 48 pages? I don't want to read all of this.

    I think someone dug it up, because, at 48 pages, its the shortest Feeneyite thread of all time.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46428
    • Reputation: +27337/-5047
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #709 on: August 11, 2023, 08:58:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is this thread I have stumbled into and why does it go from 2013 to 2017 and is 48 pages? I don't want to read all of this.

    You should have let it die the death that it deserved and not bumped it :laugh1:  Mostly likely just the OP promoting his own website.  But the site itself is now dead, so perhaps the refutations of it here helped kill it and give it the death that it deserved also.


    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #710 on: August 11, 2023, 01:41:10 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is this thread I have stumbled into and why does it go from 2013 to 2017 and is 48 pages? I don't want to read all of this.

    Just read Croixalist's post on this topic. Here, I'll make it easy for you:


    Show Posts - Croixalist (cathinfo.com)

    Go to pages 62 - 65 (I think that's the complete range) of his posts. Start with page 65 (and go back towards 62). There you will read his posts in the thread, and hear reason and sound understanding on the issue.

    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #711 on: August 11, 2023, 01:42:51 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Just read Croixalist's post on this topic. Here, I'll make it easy for you:


    Show Posts - Croixalist (cathinfo.com)

    Go to pages 62 - 65 (I think that's the complete range) of his posts. Start with page 65 (and go back towards 62). There you will read his posts in the thread, and hear reason and sound understanding on the issue.


    I'll make it even easier. Here's page 65:


    Show Posts - Croixalist (cathinfo.com)
    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline AnthonyPadua

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2106
    • Reputation: +1065/-205
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #712 on: August 11, 2023, 05:42:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'll make it even easier. Here's page 65:


    Show Posts - Croixalist (cathinfo.com)

    So it's just a bod thread for 48 pages....


    Offline Predestination2

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 611
    • Reputation: +126/-165
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Baptismofdesire.com
    « Reply #713 on: Today at 06:39:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am a "Feeneyite" and a Third Order member of the Saint Benedict Center in New Hampshire.  I posted on this before but the above website is, basically, "pounding on open doors":

    1)  Baptism of Desire confers sanctifying grace.  We all agree on that and Father Feeney taught it.  Baptism of Desire (or, "desire of Baptism") is a grace given by the One and Triune God, and everyone agrees that it will place an individual in a state of justification before God via the merits of His One and Only Son, Jesus Christ.

    2)  The character of Baptism confers grace.  Saint Thomas Aquinas, the Church's principle Doctor and theologian, taught this explicitly, but it seldom gets mentioned:



    Saint Thomas is teaching that a catechumen who dies with only "Baptism of Desire" in the absence of martyrdom and without sacramental Baptism would still have to suffer the temporal punishments in Purgatory for his/her sins.

    So, in Catholic theology, "justification" is not an either/or thing.  There are degrees of reward in Heaven just as there are degrees of punishment in Hell, so in that sense, one can become "more and more" justified before the Triune God over time.

    3)  Catholic martyrs go straight to Heaven.  This is a pitiful "straw man" that some like to "use" against we "Feeneyites."  The only question is, "Has the Sovereign God allowed such martyrs to enter into Paradise lacking the indelible seal of Baptism?"  No one at either of the two Saint Benedict Centers believes that a true martyr for Christ would go to Hell for want of sacramental Baptism, unless one wishes to apply the label "Feeneyite" to those individuals who espouse views which Father Feeney himself would have anathematized.  This brings me to my next point...

    4)  Proving negatives.  While there is universal agreement among traditional Catholics on Points #1, #2 and #3, here is where folks start to diverge.  In particular, "How could you, I, or anyone else ever 'prove,' 'know,' etc., that someone, anyone, was never sacramentally baptized, if only in that person's infancy?"  In other words, to embrace Baptism of Desire as some "standalone" de fide dogma of the Catholic Faith is to try and "prove negatives," cosmic ones, in fact.  Our God is a big God, omnipotent, which means that He can bring the character of sacramental Baptism (and, hence, its graces) to anyone whom He wishes.

    5)  Angels can baptize.  Saint Thomas taught this possibility explicitly but it rarely gets mentioned:

    "But it must be observed that as God did not bind His power to the sacraments, so as to be unable to bestow the sacramental effect without conferring the sacrament; so neither did He bind His power to the ministers of the Church so as to be unable to give angels power to administer the sacraments. And since good angels are messengers of truth; if any sacramental rite were performed by good angels, it should be considered valid, because it ought to be evident that this is being done by the will of God: for instance, certain churches are said to have been consecrated by the ministry of the angels. But if demons, who are 'lying spirits,' were to perform a sacramental rite, it should be pronounced as invalid." (Summa Theologica, IIIa, q.64, a.7)

    "Since the order of Divine Providence disposes that lower things be subject to the actions of higher, as explained above (q. 109, a. 2); as the inferior angels are enlightened by the superior, so men, who are inferior to the angels, are enlightened by them." (Summa Theologica, Ia, q.111, a.1)

    6)  Angels are outside of "time and space".  Per the Angelic Doctor, they can do amazing things:



    So, the question if there are persons in Heaven who have ended this life without sacramental Baptism is still "fair game," an open theological question, which is why there are "Feeneyites" who, to this very day, are in full communion with Rome.
    And this is why we are not feeneyites. What an absurdity to say that one can be damned without the stain of mortal or original sin! Rather BoB is fictitious, it simply means that you will be preserved until baptism,whereas BoD is like a say, Second baptism, not for the unbaptised. This is why the St Benedict centre and fr feeney were in communion with Montini, they did not teach teh truth about “BoB”, think the false arguments of flat earth society like “the earth is rising at 9.8 m/s”, it is that sort of controlled opposition feeling I get from the st Benedict centre “BoB justifies but doesn’t glorify” WHAT?
    Vatican 2 was worse than both WW1 and WW2 combined.
    So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy. 
    Tried 6,000,000 pushups, only got to 271K