CathInfo.com

  1940s to 1963...that's 20 years or less.  Where do you think the Modernists were prior to 1963?  They weren't living in caves.  They were running dioceses, like the modernist Cushing was.  Cushing wasn't a Cardinal, but he was supporting the V2 movement before V2 happened.

You obviously don't know of the modernist rot of the 'American ecclesiastical Review' books/theological committee in America in the 30s-60s either. 

Are you really arguing that V2 just happened overnight, with no preparation?  There was no brainwashing/PR which happened in the decades before?  This view makes no sense.

.

You seem to consider the Church to be a human institution, and indeed one that lacks authority.

This is seriously erroneous. The Church is protected from teaching error in its universal teaching. It also requires anyone who writes on theological matters to submit their writings for approval to the authority of the Church, which enjoys divine protection from error, and to which we as Catholics are required to submit.

You are effectively claiming that someone can claim their bishop is a heretic and then consider himself dispensed from the laws of the Church. This is completely false.

In any case, if what Feeney taught were Catholic teaching, then he wouldn't have needed to write anything at all except to say, "Read Fr. So-and-so, a theologian who teaches that baptism of desire is heretical, or that someone can't be saved with baptism of desire." But he didn't. The reason is that, quite simply, there wasn't any theologian that the Church ever approved, at any point in her history even prior to the modernist crisis, who ever said such a thing. That's why Feeney had to write his own propaganda and claim it was the teaching of the Church.