Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Doesn't matter. You are (womanly) defending an organization (SSPV), while ignoring principles..Put aside who said what (if you are femininely able to) and concentrate on the errors which remain. It doesn't matter what priest said what. It matters what is error and what is not.
If it was not Fr. Cekada, he had at least 10 years to refute it. And even if he left the SSPV, they could still publish his quote, same as the SSPX still quotes Bp. Williamson. Nevertheless, the quote was in the SSPV publication, AND in my 25 years of experience with BODers, it perfectly describes, honestly decribes, admits, the position of 99% of BODers.
Lol...more lies.
Why would Fr. Cekada "refute" a statement in an article ascribed to a "Fenton"?2Vermont is right: this "oh well" response to a false attribution that is paraded around here as a target for contempt as an example of heretical or quasi-heretical laxity regarding EENS is pathetic.
The purpose of this thread is to discuss heresy, not Fr Cekada, which you put up as a strawman, and are now defending. No one is attacking Fr Cekada; we are attacking error.