CathInfo.com

So no one knows ... what BoD is and how it works?  That's rather unusual for a defined dogma.

I'm sure that Baptism is right now saving some Hindu in Tibet, who will shortly be entering the Beatific Vision.

The use of the word “implicit” is grossly wrong.  When modernist heretics use the phrase “implicit faith”, they go on to describe a situation where an ignorant person doesn’t know something about the Church.  But something that is implicit is 100% understood (just not openly expressed).  This is why St Alphonsus’ use of implicit faith is orthodox.  He was speaking of a catechumen who was learning the faith but who just hadn’t formally asked to be baptized.  But such a one a) knew exactly what baptism was, b) knew what it meant to be a member of the Church, and c) by their actions in learning and asking questions of the Faith, was passively implying they wanted to join the Faith.  In other words, their actions were speaking in place of their words.  
.
That’s what implied means.  A “100% understanding” is part of the meaning of the word. 
.
What modernist heretics have done is apply V2’s “subsists in” theological error of Christianity to baptismal faith.  In the former, they have erroneously made belief in any type of Christianity salvific.  In the latter, they have erroneously made desire for any type of “god” or “truth” a baptism.  Both of these errors are necessary for the freemasonic one-world Church to be born.