Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Roman Catechism  (Read 20514 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SJB

The Roman Catechism
« Reply #55 on: June 10, 2010, 08:56:14 AM »
Quote from: Raoul76
Unfortunately, it is more flexible at this time than any of us would like, but I think we can all see that it is crossed by the idea that a false religion can be the means of salvation.


Yes, but some have said that this "flexibility" has led to a denial of EENS, that the Church has led everybody into heresy, which is impossible.

Offline SJB

The Roman Catechism
« Reply #56 on: June 10, 2010, 10:31:40 AM »
Quote from: Raoul76
Caminus, don't you think that if BoD were a dogma we'd have at least ONE clear statement from a Pope about it?


You mean a defined dogma, right? There are doctrines less than defined dogma that are not opinions.

Pope Pius IX made this clear in Tuas Libenter.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
The Roman Catechism
« Reply #57 on: June 10, 2010, 07:31:13 PM »
Quote from: SJB
You mean a defined dogma, right? There are doctrines less than defined dogma that are not opinions.


BoD is not one of those.

Raoul's quite right about the status quaestionis here regarding BoD.  I have problems very similar to nαzιanzen and Chrysostom regarding BoD.  See the other thread where I quote them.  You can see that the Fathers gave much more importance to the Baptismal character than BoD proponents do.  It's much more than a badge of honor but is what grants human beings the faculties capable of sustaining the supernatural virtues.

And I have TREMENDOUS problems with the implicit BoD of the "noble savage".  I do consider that Pelagianism.