Author Topic: 1949 Letter from Holy Office Correcting Feeneyite Error (Read 20978 times)

Belloc · « **Reply #30 on:** October 08, 2009, 07:51:47 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

You don't take the text of the Council in a vacuum and then plaster whatever meaning you want to it.

This is Luther's approach to the Bible,

Rather you have to look at the mindset of the Church and Council Fathers to see what they intended in the text and it is CLEAR that they in no way meant absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation.

That is at heart of CM problem, for all the Catholic clothes, he is functionally a parachurch Prot.......cut and paste texts without any background or understanding.......how do we apply things? when? where???

Belloc · « **Reply #31 on:** October 08, 2009, 07:54:26 AM »

Quote from: Jehanne

, only to the heretic Pius XII

Serious calumny without any proof......you are coming very close, if not already, at mortal sin......Jehanne, take a few days off this forum, compose an article with docuмented proof Pius XII was a heretic..........or zip it.......

I expect this silliness out of CM, sad to see it in you......

again, proof!!

Belloc · « **Reply #32 on:** October 08, 2009, 07:55:41 AM »

Quote from: Jehanne

Quote from: stevusmagnus
Pius XII was a heretic?

Was Pius X as well?

Was Catechism of Trent heretical too?

Are there any non-Feeneyites who are NOT heretics?

The Catechism of Trent did not teach "implicit faith"! (Show me where?!) As for Pius X, maybe he should have corrected Pius IX. Why, I do not know. Hindsight is always 20/20.

yup, not up to you.......now Pius IX is a heretic huh? Guess we can throw Pius X under that bus too........

Belloc · « **Reply #33 on:** October 08, 2009, 07:59:38 AM »

Quote from: Catholic Martyr

Pius XII was a heretic. BoD, NFP, and a bunch of materially heretical statements mixed into his Masonic flavoured encyclicals.Also, you may be surprised to learn that both online links to the "Catechism of St. Pius X" teach implicit desire.

um.......ok, no proof of Pius XII actually committing heresy, nor if there is proof he lost his seat or sinned prior to to make him inelligible to get said seat.........

Thank you for proving a point I made sometime ago, you are now basically saying Pius X is a heretic.......my point sometime ago was that Pius X was on chopping block next......pushing that Vacant Seat way back some more....like a Prot personal opinion, intellect and judgment.........actually, as you get no graces not surprising....

SJB · « **Reply #34 on:** October 08, 2009, 08:56:03 AM »

The feeneyite 's "dogma only" mindset allows them to deny anything they consider incorrect.

They have adopted a non-Catholic rule of Faith. The evidence of this is right before your eyes.