Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD  (Read 61113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline umblehay anmay

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 378
  • Reputation: +28/-0
  • Gender: Male
"Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
« Reply #705 on: April 05, 2011, 08:41:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Letentur coeli,” Sess. 6, July 6, 1439, ex cathedra: “We define also that… the souls of those who depart this life in actual mortal sin, or in original sin alone, go straightaway to hell, but to undergo punishments of different kinds.”[lxxvii]


    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #706 on: April 05, 2011, 08:48:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    1.- Heitanen, I'm not making up lies. People of other religions can be saved if they convert, and I personally believe that God has mercy on some Protestants. Obviously the dogma that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church is true, but it's not impossible for God to occasionally allow a Protestant who had every intention of pleasing God into Heaven.


    I not having problem with that a protestant (but who really is a Catholic without him knowing or understanding it) can be Saved if he believes in no heresy and is baptized. You are just dishonest when you ONLY mentions protestant, for you KNOW Levfebre was talking about Jews, Muslims, Hinduists, animalists, etc, and that THEY too could be saved practicing their religion.

    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    3.- You don't read posts right. I never said that people should buy food on Sunday if they didn't have to. I said that if we used your logic, we might as well not give money to a grocery store that was open on Sunday.


    That's correct since my English is not my first language, and since I sometimes read a little to fast.

    But no, you are quiet wrong in your logic. You will not be sinning for going to places on other days which likewise have open on Sundays, to say so is just ridiculous, for if so then could you not buy any food at all at any time. Don't take it to far, bad will is your problem. Only if you deliberately go there without a just case ON A SUNDAY would you be guilty. You cannot be guilty for doing what you ought to do, by doing your business there on other days. You will not be guilty for what they did on another day since you cannot hinder them anyway, they have their free will. We need to buy food to survive, this is a necessity. You know it, yet you want make such arguments.

    But no one need to eat on a restaurant on a Sunday and help another person to commit a possible mortal sin of unnecessary work on a Sunday. That you refuse to see this is sad to behold.
    Unless a person has a real necessity and just cause for eating out on Sundays, it is a mortal sin, just like eating meat on a Friday is a mortal sin, without a just cause.

    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    4.- Benedict being an anti-pope is a matter of opinion, not a necessity. There are numerous other people on this forum who don't think he's an anti-pope, if you don't like it, don't post here. I do not reject Catholic dogma on salvation, baptism, or ANYTHING else. You're an extremist, Hietanen. And extremism is a form of heresy, therefore you are a heretic. You're posts are extremely smug and arrogant. You come off as a religious know-it-all, and to be honest I'm getting tired of it, and I think other people here are as well.


    I have already proved that you reject numerous dogmas. You obstinately reject the absolute necessity of water baptism for salvation, even after I have shown you the dogmas. You obstinately reject the dogma that a heretic (Benedict XVI) cannot be the pope, or that a heretic cannot even be a Catholic. You also reject the dogma that NFP is a sin and intrinsically evil, hence that you defend other people who practice it by saying that they are not mortal sinners.

    These are just a few. So, you are a heretic, and you are clearly a liar, sadly headed for Hell. I can prove with dogma, that you are a heretic, but you just don't care. Why do you wish to be condemned? Why? Maybe you just have a weak faith such as my self, which makes you unsure about the true Faith, hence that you follow the big herd sheep of heard and what they believe.

    Pray for Faith, and in knowing the truth, and God will enlighten you SpiritusSanctus.


    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #707 on: April 05, 2011, 08:57:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    You guys have debated the ridiculous Feeneyite heresy for 70 pages!!??

    Just use your brain. God condemning someone who never had the chance to accept Christ is unjust and absurd! Case closed.


    No, you are sadly a heretic. For you are saying here that people who never even believes in Jesus Christ can be saved. You are thus contradicting the bible, the father and saints of the Church, and the dogmas.

    You have to realize that if people die without Faith in Jesus, then was these people bad. God does not condemn anyone unjustly, God does not do evil. All people that dies in faithlessness, heresy, or mortal sin, did God foreknew that they where bad and unworthy of Heaven.

    WHY PEOPLE OF BAD WILL AND PRIDE ARE LEFT IN DARKNESS

    Many people also don’t understand why so many “good” people are left in heresy or schism, faithlessness and darkness, or why so many “good” people have never even heard of Jesus Christ - and why these “good” people would be condemned and go to Hell if they died in that state, when they are not yet heretics or schismatics (for they cannot reject what they do not yet know about)?

    The answer to these questions is that God beforehand knew of these peoples rejection of the true faith even though it was never presented to them. For even though a person has never heard of the Catholic Church or Her teachings on the Eucharist, Confession, Baptism, Faith and Works unto Salvation etc, during his whole life, but that person - while reading his Bible - rejects words which clearly indicates these teachings, i.e. "unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have, you have no life in you", or "receive ye the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained;" then, if he read such and like words, but simply refused to believe that Jesus really could mean what he was saying, and that it was impossible that his personal interpretation was wrong, and if he was obstinate about his position, then he would be a mortal sinner and prideful, for he have already made up his mind that his personal interpretation is right. Thus, if ever the true position would have been presented to him, he would simply have refused to believe in it, and would then have become a heretic. I think many people who have talked with protestant heretics are aware of these facts. These protestant heretics often express opinions such as: “I simply refuse to believe such a teaching to be true”, or “I simply refuse to believe the Catholic teaching on the Eucharist, etc…”

    A humble soul will always think that it is possible that he or she has understood some things wrong, and thus will always conform herself immediately to the true faith when it is presented to her. A person who always thinks he’s right or who cannot accept advice from other people or who always have a high esteem of his own mind, he cannot, in truth, be in good disposition of ever receiving the true Catholic Faith. He would just simply refuse to believe if the true faith ever was presented to him. It’s truly a most sad and abominable pride and presumption to believe that it is not possible that one has understood some things wrong, and that one could not be corrected by other people. All heretics, without exception, have fallen in this trap of pride and presumption. The same must be said about all people who die as heretics, schismatics, pagans, infidels, Jews or Muslims, etc. A humble soul will not reject God’s words because he can’t understand it, but will rather seek to understand it, in that he prays to God for help and guidance (in knowing the truth). The mere thought or reflection of a humble soul that he or she might be in error, and her humble prayers to God coupled with abstinence from mortal sins, fervently pleading for His enlightenment concerning a specific issue, is often enough for a soul to come out of a heresy. For humility is the perfect way to Heaven, and none but the humble will enter therein.

    "Heresies are only embraced by those who had they persevered in the faith, would be lost by the irregularity of their lives."
    -St. Augustine

    The first sin that every single heretic falls for before falling into heresy is always one or many of the seven mortal sins; namely, pride, lust, gluttony, envy, greed, sloth, and wrath. By reason of their mortal sins, the devil gains the possession of their conscience by justice, and is able to influence them into believing heresies. This is the sad truth behind heresy. A person who avoids mortal sins and follows the natural law, and also tries as much as he is able to avoid venial sins, will never fall into heresy, since holy angels guard him when he is in the state of grace.

    We can never accept even the smallest venial sin. St. Teresa of Avila said, “For the love of God, take care never to grow careless about venial sin, however small … There is nothing small if it goes against so great a sovereign.” Deliberate venial sin weakens the spiritual powers, reduces our resistance to evil, and causes us to wander in our journey to the Cross. It is an illness of the soul, but not its supernatural death.

    1 John 5:16 “There is sin which is mortal … All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.”

    When a venial sin is enacted with full consent, the devil gets a hold over the person’s soul, where he is able to influence the soul more, and in a little while, he leads the soul into countless of mortal sins from this seemingly small venial sin, unless penance and amendment is made in reparation to God’s justice. A soul that continues in venial sin without quitting his sinful occasions deserve to fall into mortal sin since he rejected God’s commandments. If the soul continues committing venial sin, it will always end in mortal sin, so it’s very important to guard against mortal and venial sins at all times. Billions of poor souls are now suffering in the fires of hell, cursing their habitual venial sins that led them into committing mortal sins. If you wish to avoid joining them in the fires of hell, avoid every occasion of sin as if it were true poison.

    All heretics, and all the other people who die outside the Church and Salvation, does not seek after the truth nor prays to God to enlighten them about the truth. These people rather refuse to believe, or only believe in what they think is of the true Faith, rejecting everything else. This is the heresy or mortal sin all the Protestants or Eastern “Orthodox,” etc, fall under, who in truth (many of them) do not fully understand what the Church teaches (yet obstinately refuses to believe in it whenever it is presented to them) or would refuse to believe in it if it ever were presented to them.

    This is the exact reason why many people are left in darkness and faithlessness, since God beforehand knew of their bad will and their refusal to accept the true Catholic Faith. This is a truth of Faith that is taught by many of the Popes, Saints and Fathers of the Church.

    St. Augustine (+428): “… God foreknew that if they had lived and the gospel had been preached to them, they would have heard it without belief.”

    St. Thomas Aquinas, Sent. III, 25, Q. 2, A. 2, solute. 2: “If a man should have no one to instruct him, God will show him, unless he culpably wishes to remain where he is.”

    Pope St. Pius X, Acerbo Nimis (# 2), April 15, 1905:
    “And so Our Predecessor, Benedict XIV, had just cause to write: ‘We declare that a great number of those who are condemned to eternal punishment suffer that everlasting calamity because of ignorance of those mysteries of faith which must be known and believed in order to be numbered among the elect.’”

    Pope Benedict XIV, cuм Religiosi (# 4), June 26, 1754:
    “See to it that every minister performs carefully the measures laid down by the holy Council of Trent… that confessors should perform this part of their duty whenever anyone stands at their tribunal who does not know what he must by necessity of means know to be saved…”

    2 Corinthians 4:3: “And if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost, in whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.”

    This is why every Doctor of the Church held that no adult could be saved without knowledge of the Trinity and the Incarnation. It is why the Doctors of the Church who believed in baptism of desire (although they were wrong about this) only extended it to unbaptized catechumens who believed in the Trinity and Incarnation.

    However, we should not think we are good in any way for having the Faith or think that we are special in anyway for being brought into the Faith. This is a trap which one easily could fall for. And it is a very dangerous trap, for if a person thinks himself to be special in anyway, then he is probably already lost. Pride (in my opinion) leads most souls to Hell. It is the beginning and end of damnation. (You may of course think or consider yourself to be specially evil or sinful, such as: “that you are the worst person on earth” or “the greatest sinner on earth” etc, which is good to think about oneself). This is the way one should consider oneself: as the greatest sinner in the world and totally unworthy to receive any grace from God. In truth, personally, I do not understand why I have been brought to the Faith, and why so many pagans, Jews or Muslims, who are better than me, have not. What did I do to deserve this grace of Faith, and what did they fail to do? Why are they in darkness, while I have found the true light of the Gospel? Why, I often ask myself, without understanding why. I will quote St. Alphonsus, who explains this better than me:

    St. Alphonsus, Preparation For Death, (c. +1760): “How thankful we ought to be to Jesus Christ for the gift of faith! What would have become of us if we had been born in Asia, Africa, America, or in the midst of heretics and schismatics? He who does not believe is lost. This, then, was the first and greatest grace bestowed on us: our calling to the true faith. O Savior of the world, what would become of us if Thou hadst not enlightened us? We would have been like our fathers of old, who adored animals and blocks of stone and wood: and thus we would have all perished.”

    St. Alphonsus Liguori, Sermons (c. +1760): “How many are born among the pagans, among the Jews, among the Mohometans and heretics, and all are lost.”

    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #708 on: April 05, 2011, 09:04:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Catholics are free to differ as to what happens to unbaptized infants. Limbo is not a dogma. A Catholic is free to believe God saves them as they have no personal guilt and had no chance to remit original sin.

    I believe Aquinas and Augustine differed on this issue.


    No Catholics are NOT free to believe God saves unbaptized infants since Catholic dogma tells us that no one can be Saved without water baptism! Period. Only water baptism remits the guilt of original sin, that's a dogma. Also, people who are not baptized into the Church are not Catholics. So, unbaptized infants are not Catholics, and thus outside the Church and salvation.


    Baptism of Desire and Trent's Decree Concerning Original Sin

    Council of Trent, Session 5, Decree Concerning Original Sin, #3, ex cathedra: "If any one asserts, that this sin of Adam,--which in its origin is one, and being transfused into all bypropagation, not by imitation, is in each one as his own, --is taken away either by the powers of human nature, or by any other remedy than the merit of the one mediator, our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath reconciled us to God in his own blood, made unto us justice,sanctification, and redemption;or if he denies that the said merit of Jesus Christ is applied, both to adults and to infants, by the sacrament of Baptism rightly administered in the form of the Church; let him be anathema: For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved. Whence that voice; Behold the lamb of God behold him who taketh away the sins of the world; and that other; As many as have been baptized, have put on Christ."


    A dogma is not permitted to be denied - EVER.


    Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session 3, Chapter 4, #14, ex cathedra: "Hence, too, that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by Holy mother Church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding."


    Therefore there can be only two possible answers: Try to argue that the merit is applied by a means other than sacramental baptism, thus denying it, incurring anathema, as Trent threatenedand go to hell for calling or Lord and His Church a liar, or affirm it, refusing to believe or speak heresy.


    "Those who have learned theology well," says St. Basil, “will not allow even one iota of Catholic dogmas to be betrayed. They will, if necessary, willingly undergo any kind of death in their defence." (Apud. Theod., lib. 4, Hist. Eccl., c. xvii.) - The Catholic Dogma, Fr. Michael Muller

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #709 on: April 05, 2011, 09:04:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Letentur coeli,” Sess. 6, July 6, 1439, ex cathedra: “We define also that… the souls of those who depart this life in actual mortal sin, or in original sin alone, go straightaway to hell, but to undergo punishments of different kinds.”[lxxvii]



    This Council did not remotely have infant baptism in mind. Look at the context.


    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #710 on: April 05, 2011, 09:06:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Heit,

    Not true. You are not understanding those quotes with the mind of the Church but your own private interpretation.

    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #711 on: April 05, 2011, 09:08:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Letentur coeli,” Sess. 6, July 6, 1439, ex cathedra: “We define also that… the souls of those who depart this life in actual mortal sin, or in original sin alone, go straightaway to hell, but to undergo punishments of different kinds.”[lxxvii]



    This Council did not remotely have infant baptism in mind. Look at the context.


    Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1, 1215, ex cathedra: “But the sacrament of baptism is consecrated in water at the invocation of the undivided Trinity – namely, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – and brings salvation to both children and adults when it is correctly carried out by anyone in the form laid down by the Church.”


    Also look at the immediate above infallible decree which speaks of INFANTS.

    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #712 on: April 05, 2011, 09:10:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Heit,

    Not true. You are not understanding those quotes with the mind of the Church but your own private interpretation.



    No, you are just a heretic, it's just that simple. You deny dogmas, by an infallible condemned tactic: "under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding."


    Pope Pius IX, Vatican Council, Session 3, Chapter 4, #14, ex cathedra: "Hence, too, that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by Holy mother Church, and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding[/u]."


    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #713 on: April 05, 2011, 09:19:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
    1.- No, LeFebvre did not clearly say that people could be saved while still practicing false religions. He said that they could be saved if they eventually converted to Catholicism! ...



    Ok .. one more time... IF this quote is accurate (and I would like to see the entire address if it is available)... SS, How can you say ABL did not say people could be saved practicing thier false religion?......

    Bishop Lefebvre, Address given at Rennes, France: “If men are saved in Protestantism, Buddhism or Islam, they are saved by the Catholic Church, by the grace of Our Lord, by the prayers of those in the Church, by the blood of Our Lord as individuals, perhaps through the practice of their religion, perhaps of what they understand in their religion, but not by their religion…”



    umblehay, please keep that nonsense to your self. This is an SSPX forum. I don't have a problem with constructive criticism of the SSPX, because they are not perfect and neither was LeFebvre. However, without LeFebvre there would be no SSPX, no FSSP, no SSPV. The TLM would be almost non-existent. LeFebvre is a saint and he did not mean what you thought he did. So again, please stop the criticism of him. I have no interest in reading it. I'm a Traditional Catholic who is working on his salvation, not an extremist like Heitanen who goes around condemning everybody.


    I agree the Archbishop was a defender of the true Mass.  But to worship his every word and raise his voice to the level of infalliblity is just as wrong as raising St. Thomas to that level.  He was simply wrong on these points (mainly due to the fact the he was indoctrinated in these errors in his Priestly formation).   A great man made a mistake, why can't you just accept that?

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8273
    • Reputation: +2585/-1126
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #714 on: April 05, 2011, 09:22:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: umblehay anmay
    But to worship his every word and raise his voice to the level of infalliblity is just as wrong as raising St. Thomas to that level.


    When someone does the latter, you be sure to let us know, okay?
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline stevusmagnus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3728
    • Reputation: +826/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #715 on: April 05, 2011, 09:23:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Umble,

    Were Pius IX and XII true Popes?


    Offline Hietanen

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 189
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #716 on: April 05, 2011, 09:29:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: umblehay anmay
    I agree the Archbishop was a defender of the true Mass.  But to worship his every word and raise his voice to the level of infalliblity is just as wrong as raising St. Thomas to that level.  He was simply wrong on these points (mainly due to the fact the he was indoctrinated in these errors in his Priestly formation).   A great man made a mistake, why can't you just accept that?


    When you say mistake, what do you mean then? He did preach apostasy, the rejection of the entire Christian faith, so it's not just a simple mistake. To deny our Lord, is not just a mistake, but an antichristian error of apostasy.

    Offline umblehay anmay

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 378
    • Reputation: +28/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #717 on: April 05, 2011, 09:32:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Umble,

    Were Pius IX and XII true Popes?


    Of course, but even the Popes are  infallible ONLY when speaking from the Chair of Peter.

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-12
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #718 on: April 05, 2011, 09:53:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Catholics are free to differ as to what happens to unbaptized infants. Limbo is not a dogma. A Catholic is free to believe God saves them as they have no personal guilt and had no chance to remit original sin.

    I believe Aquinas and Augustine differed on this issue.


    Infants who die without Sacramental Baptism in Water are forever lost.  This is de fide.  What is theological opinion is where such infants will spend Eternity.  That they are excluded from Heaven, the Beatific Vision, is an infallible truth of the Catholic Faith:

    "If anyone says that, because the Lord said ‘In My Father’s house are many mansions,’ it might be understood that in the Kingdom of Heaven there will be some middle place, or some place anywhere, where the blessed infants live who departed from this life without Baptism, without which they cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven which is life eternal: Let him be anathema. For when the Lord says ‘Unless one be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he shall not enter into the Kingdom of God,’ what Catholic will doubt that one who has not deserved to be a co-heir with Christ will be a partner of the Devil?" (Pope Zosimus at the Council of Carthage XVI, Canon 3, Denzinger , 30th edition, p.45, note 2)."

    Now some will claim that the Council of Carthage, being a regional Council of the Church, was not infallible. However, St. Pope Zosimus published Carthage’s canons as his own, which made them infallible and binding upon the universal Church. This is referred to in the Council of Ephesus. Pope Zosimus’ Tractoria was sent to the whole world:

    “Pope Zosimus of blessed memory directs us, when writing to the bishops of the whole world.” (Ephesus; Denzinger 134)

    “The same teacher Zosimus trained us, who, when spoke to the the bishops of the whole world.” (Ephesus; Denzinger 135)

    “We[Zozimus], however, by the inspiration of God have referred all things to that of our brothers and co-bishops.” (Ephesus; Denzinger 134)

    This is the beginning of his Tractoria and it tells us all things are referred to the African bishops, which is why the Council of Carthage received this great praise:

    “Furthermore that which was determined in the decrees of the synod of Cathage [418 AD], we have embraced as the Apostolic See’s own (Ephesus; Denzinger 136), and,

    “But although we do not dare to esteem lightly the deeper and more difficult parts of the questions which they [Augustine and Zozimus] have treated in more detail who have restrained the heretics, we do not consider it necessary to add what their writings, according to the aforementioned regulation of the Apostolic See, have taught us.” (Ephesus; Denzinger 142)

    Offline Jehanne

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2561
    • Reputation: +459/-12
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #719 on: April 05, 2011, 10:19:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Hietanen
    Quote from: Jehanne
    Okay, let me ask you this -- what happens to an infant born of Muslim parents who is validly baptized but who dies at age one?  Age five?  Age six?  How about if the child is profoundly retarded and dies at age 40?


    First, virtually no people but Christians baptize their children with the correct wording. So when you say baptized Muslims or Jew infants, you are speaking of scenarios which virtually never happen.


    See my other thread for a plausible scenario of this:

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/The-absurdity-of-Ecuмenism