Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD  (Read 40051 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline umblehay anmay

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 378
  • Reputation: +28/-0
  • Gender: Male
"Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
« Reply #735 on: April 18, 2011, 04:45:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: gladius_veritatis
    Quote from: umblehay anmay
    Can someone please watch this video and show me where St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Alphonsis taught what is shown in the video.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/mhfm1#p/u/197/J01vVszOObY


    I watched it (most of it, anyway).  Naturally, no one will provide any citations, etc., .
    Oddly, those of the Dimonds' and Hietanen's persuasion will make truly absurd (as in, irrational and completely implausible) excuses on the part of St. Alphonsus, but grant ZERO latitude to modern men who, for all they know, are of good will.  Tis just an observation.  Do with it what you will...


    I just went back and re-read this.   Maybe I misread this the first time around, but you say "because the two Doctors you mentioned did not teach what is mentioned in the video".       Well, Bro. Dimond dosen't even bring up  anything but the dogmatic definitions.  But to reply to your question, what the two Doctors who even posed the possibility of BOD did say about it is nothing at all similar to the modernist interpretation of the dogma that developed into what is being taught even by the Trady Priests of today.   And the reason the Dimonds give less latitude to the "modern" men, IMO is that we today have access to ALL the info at our fingertips to review and discuss.  We have the ability to put everything in to proper order and perspective and look at the issues in total.  

    Why did you have to turn the focus of this video from what it was truly about (the false teachings from the SSPX) into a straw man argument about the Doctors of the Church who aren't even mention in the video?

    I'll read through the rest of the pages, but did you ever address the actual point of the video?  Or is diversion the only recourse to take so that the actual point of the video can be suppressed?


       



    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #736 on: April 21, 2011, 07:28:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Jehanne
    She could have been validly baptized in her infancy; impossible to prove that such did not happen.


    And is it possible to prove she was baptized? Also, do you honestly believe such an emphasis would be placed on her conversion and status as a catechist if that was the case? Sorry, I don't buy that.


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    "Br." Dimond errors on BOB and BOD
    « Reply #737 on: July 31, 2011, 08:25:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bumping for Iuvenalis.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,