This has to be one of the worst articles I've seen posted on this website in a while. Environmentalism is leftism, pure and simple. Environmentalists are "watermelons" -- green on the outside, red on the inside. People in the middle ages were absolutely not environmentalists.
That's just for starters, but there are many statements in the article that are scandalous.
the Christian faith it might be said is green.
This sounds like something Bergoglio would say. Probably he has.
The clergy during the Middle Ages were outlawed from hunting by the Church, seeing it as immoral.
This statement is not only false, it is abhorrent. Yes, clergy were banned from hunting, but not because hunting is immoral. If it were immoral, everybody would be banned from hunting, not just clergy. And if hunting were immoral, we would all have to be vegetarians by the same principle. But that is false and pagan. Clergy were banned from hunting because it was considered a worldly form of entertainment that was not suited to the dignity of the clerical state. It was not because of any belief against hunting.
Francis believed that if animals caused people pain or distress, it was only because God was using this as a teaching moment. For example, when mice became a nuisance, he would not hinder them because he believed humanity should not impose on wild animals.
This is false and ridiculous. No Catholic has ever believed it is wrong to kill mice that are vermin and a pest. Including St. Francis. The left has tried to co-opt St. Francis of Assisi by turning him into a communist and an eco-fanatic.
Those perspectives understand nature as matter originating from randomness and chaos. Christians and traditionalists G. K. Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, and J.R.R Tolkien still held
What?! CS Lewis was a protestant. He was absolutely not a traditionalist.
Think of the Eucharist; it’s merely a wafer in its composition, but Tolkien believed it becomes the flesh of Jesus.
Yet it is still just an ordinary wafer but beyond is wonder.
This is openly heretical. I think I've said enough to make my point now.