Author Topic: Question about Harry Potter? (Read 13407 times)

Sigismund · « **Reply #35 on:** June 17, 2013, 07:10:39 PM »

Quote from: Boots

No idea why my screen shows Charles ####ens with a bunch of #### through it.

Because the censoring software is extremely prudish and not very bright.

Rosarium · « **Reply #36 on:** June 17, 2013, 07:57:44 PM »

Quote from: Boots

I understand that & it is certainly clear in regards to Rowling, but if I applied that to movies, music & literature, I would be left with very little.
Eg. Charles ####ens was a Prot who left his wife & 10 children & took a mistress. Apparently his wife was too plain/simple. So, adulterous, heretical.
Wilde had a Catholic death, but his life apparently wasn't. Adulterous?
Wodehouse wasn't Catholic either. Heretical.
Most of the Russian writers were either non-Catholic or anti-Catholic. Adulterous, Heretical, anti-Catholic.
Where to draw the line? Just avoid the rabid anti-Catholics?
Can you see how I got into that mess?

And what is the point, that morality is relative, that convenience is a moral guiding principle?

The danger increases when we are more inundated in the things of this world, so we should be even more cautious.

Boots · « **Reply #37 on:** June 17, 2013, 11:15:57 PM »

Quote from: Rosarium

And what is the point, that morality is relative, that convenience is a moral guiding principle?

The danger increases when we are more inundated in the things of this world, so we should be even more cautious.

No, of course not - morality is not relative and convenience is most certainly not a moral guiding principle!

I was just thinking out loud. Asking the question too, but mostly thinking out loud. It will take time to assimilate and reassign new categories for the various things I have to reassess.

Boots · « **Reply #38 on:** June 17, 2013, 11:25:27 PM »

I just tried a few words in preview & found that only Charles Dickens is being targeted.
Check this out:
Charles Dickens
William Shakespeare
Little Dorrit
Dick Tracy
Nicholas Nickleby
David Copperfield
Oliver Twist
Our Mutual Friend
Martin Chuzzlewit
Dombey and Son
The Pickwick Papers
Charles Dickens
Dick Van Dyke
Hyacinth Bucket
Charles Richardens
A Tale of Two Cities
Dickies makes durable trousers.
Throw the suitcase in the dickie.

Okay, well maybe Charles D is not the only one being singled out. Curious.

Oakenshield · « **Reply #39 on:** June 19, 2013, 07:38:58 PM »

Quote from: gobosox91

I'm just curious to see what the general Catholic opinion on J. K. Rowling's popular saga. I understand that very fanatic people will call it satanic and evil, as they say it promotes witchcraft.
First off, I only liked Harry Potter from 1999-2003 and just gave up on it, because they were making the movies while the books were still being written and it took forever for book 5 to come out, and in that time I came to love J. R. R. Tolkien's Middle Earth. I love The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.

But why do Christians endorse J. R. R. Tolkien's works, which he wrote as Christian (particularly Catholic) allegories, as well as C. S. Lewis' Narnia series, but believe Harry Potter comes from the depths of hell? I was always aware that true witchcraft was bad and that the only true faith was Christianity, particularly Catholicism. I never met anybody who was inspired to dabble in satanism and the occult because they read Harry Potter? This magic they speak of is fiction, and real magic is to be condemned. As long as they know the difference...? How can we endorse certain fantasy stories by people like Tolkien and Lewis, but we condemn J. K. Rowling as being inspired by the devil?

Harry Potter, if you've noticed, uses his powers for his own benefit.It is showing sorcery to be "okay" and "awesome." (Some kids actually, after reading the books, thought there was such a place as a witch school or whatever they call it and tried to apply for it.) In LOTR it's nothing like that. nothing. nothing.