Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: panoramic & macro photography  (Read 3282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
panoramic & macro photography
« on: July 17, 2021, 03:21:14 PM »
Any photographers out there?

After many years in the low light level niche (it used to be a big deal to push process film to ASA/ISO 1600, but digital cameras trump that by miles), I would like to start doing panoramic photography. That is… when I am well enough.

I ask for tripod head recommendations. I would like a head that allows both landscape and portrait layouts and, importantly, can be set for rotation around the mid-focal length of the lenses instead of rotating around the axis of the camera body base. Spirit levels to set true horizontal and vertical are also desirable.

I will also use the head for macro focus stacking.

I was pleased to discover that software I already use for my website, Photoshop, does image stitching of panoramas and focus stacking. Any comments on how well Photoshop and Lightroom work for these purposes?

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter


Re: panoramic & macro photography
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2021, 04:33:36 PM »
Mark, the pros seem to rely on Photoshop and Lightroom. I am no pro, I use Paint.Net and Darktable and get by.

For stitching panoramas I use a free program called Autostitch.

I can't recommend a good tripod head, I'm inbetween good tripods. I got rid of my heavyweight aluminum classic, and now have a mistaken cheapie purchase that's wobbly with a metal gimbal. I setup a gimbal with a macro rail to try to get panoramas adjusting for that special turning point to avoid distortion. All too heavy and unstable for the wobbly thing. 

Most people nowadays seem to prefer the ball heads as being best due to convenience. I like things that smoothly turn instead, but it all gets very awkward and shin bruising rushing out to get a shot with a big tripod setup. So I mostly don't use a tripod at all and just try to hand guesstimate the turning point for quick panoramas. If they don't work out it's fine, my regular photos are fine enough. And while I have a nice macro lens, I never quite got into focus stacking for macro. Though I did try astro stacking for awhile, the light pollution is just too much here for me to get anywhere with it, I really wanted to get into astro but just have to focus elsewhere -- man proposes God disposes. :)

I mainly just do cloud and sky photography and birds, which occassional flowering plants season permitting.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: panoramic & macro photography
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2021, 05:26:58 PM »
The array of tripods multiplied by the array of heads is bewildering—even if you stay with one brand.

I have a very stable (= heavy) Manfrotto that I use with a "Hog Saddle" for long range rifle shooting. I was planning on pulling the Hog Saddle and replacing it with the panoramic head when I find one. I wouldn't dream of using my lightweight (=flimsy) travel tripod for panoramas.

Since I already use the Adobe software for my website, it is "free" (sort of).

We too have overwhelming city glow. I am still homebound. Maybe in a few months I can make the drive for photo opportunities.

Re: panoramic & macro photography
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2021, 03:54:29 AM »
In the meantime you can do your best with backyard birds, flora and skies.

There's a lot to be found in the clouds.

Even in the best of times and health it can be hard to travel for photos after all.

'Let everything in creation draw you to God. Refresh your mind with some innocent recreation and needful rest, if it were only to saunter through the garden or the fields, listening to the sermon preached by the flowers, the trees, the meadows, the sun, the sky, and the whole universe. You will find that they exhort you to love and praise God; that they excite you to extol the greatness of the Sovereign Architect Who has given them their being.'

St. Paul of the Cross