Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 12

Author Topic: Mel Gibson/Resurrection  (Read 9815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marion

Re: Mel Gibson/Resurrection
« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2022, 02:59:40 PM »
Quote from: Integralism1234 on March 31, 2022, 09:34:55 AM
The kikes are going to plant something against Mel Gibson to make sure this movie doesn't get released. A "DUI", "antisemitic remarks".

They hate the Passion because the Jєωs know they are the most responsible for the biggest crime of all time.

The temple was destroyed and the Jєωs were scattered; punishment for deicide.

Today the Church is destroyed and the Catholics are scattered. The time of tribulation is going on, "a time such as never was from the time that nations began even until that time".

The latter punishment seems more severe, hence the corresponding crime too; Great Apostasy in spite of all graces.


Come quickly, Lord Jesus!
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Mel Gibson/Resurrection
« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2022, 03:05:47 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 31, 2022, 11:13:52 AM
My issue with it was the opposite.  She hesitated to go comfort Our Lord and St. John practically had to plead with her to go.  I find that insulting to Our Lady.  She would never have hesitated for a single second.  Also, the scene where the Child Jesus falls down gently onto some straw from his height of about 2-feet depicts Our Lady "losing it", frantically flailing her hands chasing after the Child and losing her composure.  Also an insult to Our Lady.
Like I said above, perhaps it was more about thinking she would be taking away from His Passion/intervening in the Passion knowing He was supposed to suffer.  

There was a book out at the time of the movie that had a number of questions that were answered to explain this or that about the scenes/Mel's choices.  I wonder whether this one was mentioned at all.   
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Mel Gibson/Resurrection
« Reply #22 on: March 31, 2022, 05:46:46 PM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on March 31, 2022, 03:05:47 PM
Like I said above, perhaps it was more about thinking she would be taking away from His Passion/intervening in the Passion knowing He was supposed to suffer. 

That's not the way it came across to me at all.
Logged

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Re: Mel Gibson/Resurrection
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2022, 12:58:39 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 31, 2022, 11:13:52 AM
Also, the scene where the Child Jesus falls down gently onto some straw from his height of about 2-feet depicts Our Lady "losing it", frantically flailing her hands chasing after the Child and losing her composure.  Also an insult to Our Lady.

Our Lord would not have been capable of falling as depicted, imo.  She would not lose Her composure; He would not lose His balance in any situation other than the one on the Via Crucis.
Logged

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: Mel Gibson/Resurrection
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2022, 08:14:58 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 24, 2022, 03:13:06 PM
Same.  Although the Resurrection apparently just deals with the First Glorious Mystery, or actually, the time between His death on the cross and His Resurrection.  I'd love to see him get through them all in this movie.

I must say, however, that I did not care for his casting of the Jєωess to play the part of Our Lady.  I didn't like her or her looks ... so that put me off quite a bit.
The worst. She crucified the role.  
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 12
« previous next »