Absolutely. But when you read the books, try to put the movies out of your mind. The movies are loosly based on the books and the overall goal in the stories is the same. But they are not the same stories.
Having read
The Hobbit and
LOTR well before any of the movies came out, upon seeing the first movie,
The Fellowship of the Ring, and realizing how much of the story was left out, I couldn't stomach watching them any further. On top of that, trying to get what little story was saved within two hours, it felt as if one was on a roller coaster ride as the hollowed-out plot moved along. So fast that, as was alluded to earlier, one needed to know a lot of the background/character development from the books just to understand what was happening on the screen. Not my cup of tea.
Also, recall that the movies came out in the early 2000's, which was a time when CGI was really coming into its own. However, it was also a time when television series were just beginning to ramp up their productions as well. IMO,
The Hobbit and
LOTR would have been much better served as a television series, with each season being a book (or possibly even several seasons covering a single book). By doing so, each book could have been given 10 - 15 hours of screen time (20 - 22 hours if it were done by a network), as opposed to 2 - 3 hours it was given for the big screen. This would have allowed for much deeper character development, and a chance to tell a greater portion of the story.