You do good in saving up your money; but the second part of your post demonstrates a selfish attitude. That is precisely what the majority of ugly feminist women today think, and that is why we live in an American society where most women look repulsive.

No, not selfish, just honest, maybe a bit cynical.  I don't judge myself upon other's opinions of my physical appearance.  I'm neat, cleanly, but make-up just isn't on my radar.  

I rate about a 3 on the physical attractiveness scale.  So I save my money for things other than make-up.  If you can't stand my looks, well, look the other way.

An eminently Catholic response!

Thought this talk was very interesting.  Be patient and listen to the whole thing.  She describes how she reverse engineered a dating website and found herself a suitable husband.

Lots of interesting thought provoking ideas.



Marketing is fun.

I don't think she discovered anything monumental here. It really just shows how dumb she was being to begin with.
.
Yes, if you want to interact with normal people on a dating site, you're going to have to put a little effort into filling out the profile and posting a decent picture.
.
No, you shouldn't bother striking up serious conversation with someone just because they respond to your ad. Any female will get a certain number of responses no matter what she does. It doesn't take a formal rating system to understand that you should look for some degree of compatibility before you even bother with a serious conversation, even more so before you meet them in person.

What she did was rather clever.

Actually, her data collection via the fake profiles didn't even make much sense. She wanted to know what the sort of person she wanted to marry would be interested in so that she could market herself that direction. To accomplish that goal, she created 10 fake men who were similar to someone she'd be interested in marrying. Then, she analyzed the people who sent messages to those 10 ads. Now, how exactly did messages initiated by the women tell her anything at all about what the man would be looking for? It didn't really. She was successfully collecting data, but it wasn't specific to what her dream man would be looking for, only to the types of women who would also be interested in her dream man. She did correctly refer to them as "the competition" but her data would in no way tell her how she should go about beating that competition.
.
Either way, it's obvious enough that popular profiles begin with good pictures. The dating site itself will tell you as much when you fill out the profile.

"Torments of women who were idolaters of their beauty."

They had for hair serpents which cruelly bit at their face, while other demons sank hot pins, heated by the fire into all parts of their bodies, and to whet the regrets of their conscience, they ceased not to say: " You did our job  on earth, it is just that you be associated with us for eternity. Do your make-up in these flames." These souls responded with horrible blasphemies and insults of their enemies. "

 Vie de St. Francoise Romaine, Abbe Paul Muguet, pp 407-408

I personally think that make up is just over-rated. No amount of make up will help a really ugly woman. For example, women under 5 in the beauty scale, will not benefit much from make up. They are a lost cause on the physical regard. Likewise, truly beautiful women, say above 8 in the beauty scale, would also benefit very little because...well they are naturally beautiful and need nothing else. These women usually look very natural even if they put on little make up here and there, no one can tell and no one cares. For the average rest, let's say number 6 and 7s, make up can help, but not by much, probably will only add 1 point or so in the beauty scale.  What I see a lot of, are completely self - deluded women who think that make up would perform true miracles on them, by transforming them into beautiful, when it is just not the case. They just look like extravagant clowns or low self--esteem sluts. I think most of the low-value prostitutes fell into this last category.

This is completely false; women can be radically transformed by makeup.

Was that before or after he converted to conciliarism and the Novus Ordo?