This makes absolute sense to me.
The effect any action is intended to have must be considered.
A secretary going to work and covering up some acne scars or a birthmark with concealer or foundation is clearly not going out of her way to be sɛҳuąƖly provocative.
Likewise these Russian dancers are wearing make-up in order to look the same for reasons that aid the artistic performance.
Subjective intention will bear upon moral culpability, but not upon the objective reality of the act.
That said, I do agree that the saints who have condemned cosmetics probably did not have quasi-medical uses in mind, such as you mention.
But that said, let’s be honest: That exception isn’t really what we are talking about here. What has the feathers ruffled is the idea women shouldn’t wear makeup in cases other than such as you mention.
90% want to be able to wear makeup to “look gooood” for the world, and not just their husbands in the privacy of their homes.
If that wasn’t true, this thread would have ended with that concession from the St Thomas quote.
But that wasn’t enough: The vain and strident are not satisfied with that much.
They want to wear makeup periods, and are looking for a cuмulative of exceptions to make the teachings of the saints go away.