There hasn't been a single country that first received missionaries from among their own ethnicity. There isn't a single culture that can claim anything truly good without having Christ behind it in some way. It's clear now that God allowed certain pagan societies build up an amount of virtue that would eventually translate positively to Christian life once they converted (the Greeks), while others had to essentially start over (the Aztecs). Now that the majority of all former Christian nations have completely apostatized, we can't even rely on those natural graces those pre-Christian people used to enjoy. We are so astonishingly impoverished, that even now traditionalist Catholics are falling for the conceit that somehow DNA is the real difference. This is antichrist and it must stop.
Satanic Black subculture is holding black people back from breaking out of their own identity politics, their welfare single mothers, their deadbeat dads, their desire to have what everyone else has. Not once have I heard of a black person wanting to receive the sacraments and being denied. It's not that they are too stupid to understand what is right or wrong, it's usually because they have set their sights so low as they refuse to look beyond the belt buckle, which in some cases is down around the ankles. They have allowed themselves to become obsessed with the power of godless men and women. They seem content to receive the minstrel role assigned to them by the father of Lies as long as they have access to pleasure. But as disadvantaged as that community may seem to be, what metrics have the "white" communities not followed them after a few years: divorce, cohabitation, abortion, contraception, children out of wedlock, witchcraft, promiscuity, whore-mongering, gold-digging, substance-abusing, drug-dealing, bad music, bad grades, violence, etc.? By the time we've prided ourselves in saying we're not as bad as they are, we've already lost the plot. It might be considered a blessing for them who never had a Catholic faith to fall from than for the rest of us who did. The prior faith of our ancestors may have afforded a small buffer to the chaos, but there's no denying our trajectory now. Our skin won't save us. Does it really matter if a welfare baby-momma is better or worse than a SJW SWF LGBT? A gang-banger thug opposed to a simpering soy boy? These aren't vocations from God.
More histrionic straw-manning. Who ever said "DNA is the real difference?" What "real difference?" Who said "our skin will save us?"
Do you believe God made the races absolutely identical in terms of physical strength, intelligence, temperament, etc.?
Do you not acknowledge that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan seems to show an inordinate interest in promoting racial indifferentism, integration, intermarriage, etc. and always with the goal of eliminating European peoples? Wouldn't promotion of racially indifferent attitudes which benefit the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan's agenda be more deserving of being labelled "antichrist?"
Why do you regard the term "identity politics" with the sneering contempt of a civic nationalist? How can politics be anything but identity-based in a multi-racial, multi-religious society?
Anne Catherine Emmerich believed sub-Saharan Africans were subject to the Curse of Ham, thus their skin being marked as darker than what she called, "the lighter-skinned noble races." No Church authority ever censured her for this, let alone labelled her "antichrist." Why do you suppose that is?
Grace builds upon nature, no? Grace does not transform nature. Catholic Haiti has, since throwing off her French masters more than two centuries ago, wavered between bare functionality and out-and-out savagery. European countries which have apostatized have not. Is that to say there has not been vice and sin in those European countries? Of course not. But they remain functional as societies where Haiti has not. Why? Grace builds on nature, but nature remains what it is.
Pope Paul III condemned the position that the savage races were dumb brutes incapable of receiving the Catholic faith. Pope Pius XII basically reiterated that in Mit Brennender Sorge, condemning exaltation of race "to idolatrous levels," which the former error condemned by Paul III would clearly seem to be. That's the extent of the Church's position on what moderns call "racism." Well, who here has said a single word contrary to those papal pronouncements? Rather, we seem to be repeatedly taken to task by racial indifferentists for affirming, like Pius XII himself did, that race is "a fundamental value of the human community... necessary and honorable (in its) function in worldly things."
I would argue that what is "antichrist" is that traditional Catholics have - implicitly or explicitly - internalized the moral category of "Racism," which was defined not by the Church, but by Marxist Jews in the 20th Century. We all - Catholics included - had grandparents or great-grandparents whom the modern world would deem "racist." Racial indifferentism is the novelty here, not racial realism. Catholics were, if nothing else, always that on all subjects, including race - realists.