Author Topic: SSPX, have they fallen for this trap? (Read 1021 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** October 24, 2013, 07:11:53 PM »

Does SSPX now call the true Mass the 'Extraordinary Form'?

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #1 on:** October 25, 2013, 10:42:33 AM »

I wonder if the Vatican technically could make the distinction between the 1962 missal being the "Extraordinary rite" because of the (unprecedented) additions and subtractions that were done that year.

If they are, go ahead and say that the 1962 missal is an "extraordinary form." The Novus Ordo of course would not be the ordinary form, but it would be any missal from 1570 until 1961, would be considered the "ordinary form."

Just my brief ranting for the day.

Capt McQuigg · « **Reply #2 on:** October 25, 2013, 11:52:56 AM »

I think the idea of changing the 1962 mass and still calling it the 1962 mass is a form of forgery or corruption and is misleading and dishonest.

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #3 on:** October 25, 2013, 12:08:04 PM »

The fact that the missal was changed at all by John XXIII is a form of forgery and corruption and is misleading and dishonest. One only has to read Quo Primum to see that.

Author Topic: SSPX, have they fallen for this trap? (Read 1021 times)

Änσnymσus

SSPX, have they fallen for this trap?

parentsfortruth

SSPX, have they fallen for this trap?

Capt McQuigg

SSPX, have they fallen for this trap?

parentsfortruth

SSPX, have they fallen for this trap?