Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

What is the primary reason that you are less active, or no longer active, on CathInfo?

Would like to be more active but no longer have the time due to external factors unrelated to CI.
9 (25.7%)
Think/feel that the forum dynamics have become unhealthy overall and will/would resume participation if/when things change. Please share thoughts on necessary changes.
9 (25.7%)
Primarily as a protest to a specific policy or member. Please share.
2 (5.7%)
Think/feel that continued participation, or participation to the degree formerly practiced, is counterproductive for me at this time.
9 (25.7%)
Other. Please share.
6 (17.1%)

Total Members Voted: 33

Author Topic: What is the primary reason that you are less active, or no longer active, on CI?  (Read 31668 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bonaventure

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1326
  • Reputation: +856/-275
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!1
  • I voted the "counterproductive" option.

    Too many whackos here that end up being a waste of time with futile back-and-forth discussion.

    That, and I think the 'anonymous' section is overused by a bunch of feckless fαɢs.  

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not sure where you live or your age range but the boomers (actual boomers) in my country had incredible opportunity. Any young man working 3-5 years up until the late 80s could easily save up to buy a house outright by living at home with their parents. Even until the mid 2000s housing was still relatively cheap. Obviously before the 90s it was much easier than the early 2000s but things hadn't gone full ponzi just yet. Schooling was also much cheaper. Schools actually taught you skills back then, I know boomers who learnt real life skills in their public schools, unlike mine which had extremely basic cooking, metal and wood working classed (the cooking classes were crap). Personally I don't like modern wood working, there is something very relaxing about creating works made from wood by hand without using powered machinery. Those extremely fast rotating blades are very dangerous and the fine particles is very bad for the lungs.

    My boomer parents could fill a shopping cart with meats, cheese and other 'real' foods for under $100 to feed a small family, filling up the tank in their car also cost them less than $20 a week. They may have made less money but their money from a single income (in the 80s) was still enough for a small family to have it good. I don't know about your circuмstances but most boomers do not match what you said.
    I think they meant 1960


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  I just don't like certain kinds of people denying the massive advantage they had, it's a denial of their responsibility as elders for making the world a worse and more unholy place for their children.
    Take a long hard look at the so-called "greatest generation," the one prior to the 1946 to 1964 generation. If you have a deep emotional need to blame some generation for your problems, blame them.

    Offline Minnesota

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2399
    • Reputation: +1373/-647
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Too many Charlie Kirk threads.
    I started the one seeing that "oh wow, Charlie Kirk is dead" and then had to go to work. Unfortunately, it has devolved into madness with a new wacko thread every 3 hours.

    I tell people all the time that they're overanalyzing, that they're thinking too hard. And with this, they absolutely are. Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck and died right there, no reports or confirmation needed. A bullet wound there is not survivable. The end. Someone like him in today's age could not just randomly go into hiding somewhere and not be caught. Be serious right now.
    Christ is Risen! He is risen indeed