Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants  (Read 7449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2019, 05:17:51 PM »
When women dress provocatively they sin by their own free will.  But in no way are they culpable for a sin a man commits as a result unless their goal was to entice a man to commit sin.

This is simply not true.  Even if a woman did not intend to entice a man to sin, she could be partly culpable if she knew that it could happen.  Even more remotely, she could be culpable for that sin even if she simply neglected to properly form her conscience regarding the matter.  There are degrees of culpability in another's sin.  Now ... if she neither suspected that something like that could happen nor was negligent in forming her conscience, then she does not have culpability in his sin, not formally anyway even if she were materially responsible.  You're being a bit too much of a subjectivist here.

Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2019, 05:22:25 PM »


Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2019, 05:25:28 PM »
What is interesting to me is that someone posted what the SSPX was teaching only a few years ago about women wearing pants.

Was the SSPX so overrun by the uncatholic feminist horde that it "had" to waive the white flag?

The only thing worse than an uppity, strident woman is a faggy man trying to ingratiate himself to them by taking up their cause.

I picture such men as effeminate little church mice, doing their wife's bidding at all times.

I see them in my chapel more than ever before: They are the ones taking the crying babies out of the chapel, or changing their diapers, etc.

Ultimately, this is all the fault of the men: If they weren't such wussies, and demanded to either wear the pants, or send the women packing, we wouldn't be in this shape.

Do any of these soft "men" know how to fight, drink beer, gut a deer, or change the oil??

By the way they soft-shoe around their wives at the chapel, one must be allowed to doubt it.

What is more disgusting than a gentle, subservient milk-toast "man?" 

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2019, 05:26:44 PM »
Now I fully understand why they never say anything about how the young girls dress every day (short shorts, belly exposed, tight jeans, tube miniskirts tank tops...…..). They do not give a hoot.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #24 on: March 07, 2019, 05:58:39 PM »
The former pastor at my sspx church only a year ago said that women should not ever wear pants in a sermon.  There was also just a womens retreat with Colleen Hammond the author as a speaker.
I would imagine the US district office like Menzingen is totally cut off from the real trad world.