Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10

Author Topic: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants  (Read 7446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nadir

Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #25 on: March 07, 2019, 06:52:03 PM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on March 07, 2019, 05:22:25 PM
A picture is worth 1000 words. I am speechless.
I just had a revelation!
Did anybody else observe how four of the women, the ones fully visible to the camera, hold their hands. It appears they are somehow, either consciously or unconciously, aware of what the OP explained. It's almost like they are shamed. NOtice that the woman at the rear has her hands behind her.
Logged

Offline LongHaired CountryBoy

Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #26 on: March 07, 2019, 07:35:40 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on March 06, 2019, 10:17:39 PM




Modest professional office work attire. So what.
Maybe they save their dresses for Mass.

But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth.
~ Apocalypse of St. John 3:16
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #27 on: March 07, 2019, 08:08:39 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on March 07, 2019, 05:58:39 PM
The former pastor at my sspx church only a year ago said that women should not ever wear pants in a sermon.  There was also just a womens retreat with Colleen Hammond the author as a speaker.
I would imagine the US district office like Menzingen is totally cut off from the real trad world.  

As I have said many times, there is some residual Trad (dare I say, residual GOOD) to be found in the SSPX. That includes priests and faithful. However, just like the Novus Ordo, that percentage will become smaller with every year. The problem is that the organization as a whole, from the top down, has chosen a path that necessarily leads to destruction: adopting a peace with the Modern World. That can only end badly.

If you have a good priest who preaches unchanging (Trad) Catholic doctrine, GREAT! But who will replace him? How soon until he has to make a big choice? What choice will he make? He is the exception to the rule. The organization is still fallen, and still sinking. Even if you happen to have found a nice dry spot on the Titanic which will sink last...

Matthew
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #28 on: March 07, 2019, 08:38:14 PM »
Quote from: Anonymous on March 07, 2019, 05:25:28 PM
What is interesting to me is that someone posted what the SSPX was teaching only a few years ago about women wearing pants.

Was the SSPX so overrun by the uncatholic feminist horde that it "had" to waive the white flag?

The only thing worse than an uppity, strident woman is a faggy man trying to ingratiate himself to them by taking up their cause.

I picture such men as effeminate little church mice, doing their wife's bidding at all times.

I see them in my chapel more than ever before: They are the ones taking the crying babies out of the chapel, or changing their diapers, etc.

Ultimately, this is all the fault of the men: If they weren't such wussies, and demanded to either wear the pants, or send the women packing, we wouldn't be in this shape.

Do any of these soft "men" know how to fight, drink beer, gut a deer, or change the oil??

By the way they soft-shoe around their wives at the chapel, one must be allowed to doubt it.

What is more disgusting than a gentle, subservient milk-toast "man?"
Changing a diaper and soothing a crying baby is being more of a man than fighting. One shows that you're there for the family and taking responsibility and the other is useless and potentially lethal machismo that doesn't serve any purpose.
Logged

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: US District Office: Women Wear the Pants
« Reply #29 on: March 08, 2019, 02:41:58 AM »
Quote from: Anonymous on March 07, 2019, 08:08:39 PM
As I have said many times, there is some residual Trad (dare I say, residual GOOD) to be found in the SSPX. That includes priests and faithful. However, just like the Novus Ordo, that percentage will become smaller with every year. The problem is that the organization as a whole, from the top down, has chosen a path that necessarily leads to destruction: adopting a peace with the Modern World. That can only end badly.

If you have a good priest who preaches unchanging (Trad) Catholic doctrine, GREAT! But who will replace him? How soon until he has to make a big choice? What choice will he make? He is the exception to the rule. The organization is still fallen, and still sinking. Even if you happen to have found a nice dry spot on the Titanic which will sink last...

Matthew
As I keep saying, it is 1965 all over again. I'll update that now after seeing this picture of the female office workers in pants:

In a few years, it will be 1969 and the SSPX will be doing the Novus Ordo "right this time", in Latin and with "reverence" and the good SSPX priests will be independents.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
« previous next »