Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Anσnymσus Posts Allowed => Topic started by: CoffeeEveryDay on October 05, 2022, 05:16:36 PM
-
Look at who is against Russia.
-
So you have to be a plant in order to be against Russia? This thread actually sounds like a divisive tactic implemented by a would-be Fed or JDIF infiltrator...
-
Find something useful to do with the time God has given you instead of wasting it on this stupidity.
-
I'm CIA
Catholic in agony over more crap
https://www.gloria.tv/post/4Z1iC3G6pwMDExWpiP1KCj21R
They aren't even hiding it anymore.
-
Find something useful to do with the time God has given you instead of wasting it on this stupidity.
Reply #2 was in response to the OP, not DL.
So you have to be a plant in order to be against Russia? This thread actually sounds like a divisive tactic implemented by a would-be Fed or JDIF infiltrator...
I think you're correct, DL, but it isn't worth the effort. Doing a good job cleaning the toilet is probably more conducive to bringing about the reign of Christ than playing whack-a-mole with trolls, whether they are paid professionals or just pathetic basement dwellers.
-
I'm CIA
Catholic in agony over more crap
https://www.gloria.tv/post/4Z1iC3G6pwMDExWpiP1KCj21R
They aren't even hiding it anymore.
That's me. Forgot to check the box. Again. Newbs gonna noob.
-
I give up. I checked the box and it still posted anonymous.
-
I would accept the possibility (not that it suffices by itself as proof) only if ...
1) member signed up right when the Russia situation started to intensify, and especially if right after the special military operation commenced
2) vast majority of the member’s posts are about Russia, and the member seems to care very little about any other subject
-
Good, maybe they will convert.
-
So you have to be a plant in order to be against Russia? This thread actually sounds like a divisive tactic implemented by a would-be Fed or JDIF infiltrator...
Kudos, DL. If only more people had your intellectual honesty. I strongly disagree with Ladislaus on this topic, but I think he honestly believes he's telling the truth. I realize I don't get the same benefit of the doubt, but that's okay.
-
:facepalm:
-
Kudos, DL. If only more people had your intellectual honesty. I strongly disagree with Ladislaus on this topic, but I think he honestly believes he's telling the truth. I realize I don't get the same benefit of the doubt, but that's okay.
What do you mean? I didn't say you weren't sincere in your beliefs about Russia. My issues were more with some of the statements you made during the argument, where you were criticizing me in a post while doing the exact same thing in the very post you were making to criticize me for it.. That reminded me of when I ripped to shreds by people judging me for being judgmental (simply for stating that Dr. Sungenis was intellectually dishonest on the subject of Flat Earth) and slandering me with the charge of slander, and judging me in the internal forum for judging someone else "in the internal forum" (even though I had done no such thing -- as accusing someone of "intellectual dishonesty" (aka bias) is not to judge the internal form (as someone could do that without even being aware of it, and I even defined what I meant by that at the very beginning and before anyone else attacked me for it, clearly stating that I believed that Sungenis was a man of good character with with some mental block on this particular subject). As I mentioned, self-contradiction like that is a major pet peeve. I just find myself incapable of letting contradiction and bad logic stand by being unaddressed.
-
:facepalm:
Given this this is posted in Anonymous, it's very possibly coming from a troll, or could just be an isolated case of trolling ... and could even be from someone who's mocking people like me who have accused some of promoting the Globohomo agenda. I never accused anyone of doing it deliberately or being a plant, but exaggerating the position is one tactic used to discredit an opponents position. You exaggerate or distort what they actually said so that you create a straw man that discredits your opponent. Alternatively, it could be someone who does sincerely believe that it's Globohomo/Jew West vs. quasi-Christian-natural-law-defending Putin ... and is, again, making an exaggeration to mock those who are a on that side of the issue.
So, he could be mocking EITHER side or else (least likely) could be dead serious.
Hard to say, but regardless of intent here, this is another case of the Anonymous forum being abused ... except in the highly-unlikely event that the person here is dead serious and believes that the CIA/Jєωιѕн plants here on the forum would personally go after him.
-
I will be glad if the Russian crushes the Jєωιѕн Masonic elites. After what they have done these last few years they deserve to fall. I would also be glad if the Mohammedan defeated them.
However, I don't support Putin because of what I have already said in other threads.
-
Forgott clic buttonl
-
What do you mean? ...
Sorry, that was a bit too general, but this topic represents a popular sentiment. Thinking on it, "but that's okay" sounds self-piteous versus what I intended to say. If you could read that as "but I don't hold it against anyone who might be unwittingly in error." I don't want to get too deeply into the rest of it, but of course I disagree with your assessment. I'm receiving a lot of rhetoric, not sound dialectic.
-
That was me ::)
-
I'm receiving a lot of rhetoric, not sound dialectic.
That is all you will get.