Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Anσnymσus Posts Allowed => Topic started by: Änσnymσus on December 29, 2012, 06:03:28 PM
-
Fr. Bisig - anyone remember him? The Swiss priest who didn't agree with the Archbishop and schemed with Rome to start the FSSP. Now we have another Swiss priest, +Fellay scheming with Rome.
Question: Fr. Bisig was opposed to ++Lefebvre therefore he joined Rome. +Fellay says he is in accord with ++Lefebvre and wants to join Rome. How can both of these Swiss priests be right?
I think they have holes in their cheese.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Bisig
-
Bisig was an untrustworthy man.
-
Bishop Fellay's sins of betrayal to Our Lord, the Faith and +ABL are far greater than Fr. Bisig's sins.
He was given many graces and, like Judas, rejected them.
-
Bishop Fellay's sins of betrayal to Our Lord, the Faith and +ABL are far greater than Fr. Bisig's sins.
He was given many graces and, like Judas, rejected them.
Bishop Fellay has more experience, more pastoral time, confessional experience, and priests who report to him - hence, leadership experience.
So yes, Bishop Fellay would be more accountable than Fr. Bisig.
However, did Bishop Fellay actually betray the SSPX or merely engage in inappropriate negotiations?
-
WHATEVER HE DID .. THE SOCIETY IS GONE PEARSHAPED, AND THE BUCK STOPS WITH +FELLAY!
-
Interesting question:
Answer: By Bp. Fellay's Six Conditions" he has already "... approved and determined" to make a Practical agreement in lieu of a Doctrinal Agreement.
Therefore, he has consented, in writing to: "A danger to the Faith", as taught by St. Thomas Aquinas.
Therefore, we... the SSPX-Resistance, "the inferiors", have a duty to correct the superior (Msgr. Fellay), even in public, because the Practical agreement is a danger to the Faith.
Reference: SSPX-SO