Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: THE 1962 MISSAL  (Read 737 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
THE 1962 MISSAL
« on: May 14, 2012, 10:29:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Priests who quit the SSPX should also quit using the Bugnini 1962 Missal. This Missal has been subject to changes and more may well be on the way. Why do they have to waste their time scrutinizing and commenting on changes made to this missal by the Vatican II Modernists?

    THE FIRST GENERAL CHAPTER OF THE SSPX SANCTIONED THE USE OF THE MISSAL, BREVIARY, CALENDAR AND RUBRICS OF IT'S PATRON ST PIUS X. THESE WERE DISCARDED IN 1983 BY FR SCHMIDBERGER.
    Logged

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4622/-480
    • Gender: Male
    THE 1962 MISSAL
    « Reply #1 on: May 15, 2012, 07:00:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I wonder if the SSPX will officially adopt the Missal of Benedict 16 (2008 Missal) if there's a "canonical status" agreement made.  

    We'll have about a year before we find out, I guess.
    Logged

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    THE 1962 MISSAL
    « Reply #2 on: May 15, 2012, 08:21:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: TKGS
    I wonder if the SSPX will officially adopt the Missal of Benedict 16 (2008 Missal) if there's a "canonical status" agreement made.  

    We'll have about a year before we find out, I guess.


    Do they, or will they celebrate the feasts of Escriva and Divine Mercy etc?
    Logged

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5768
    • Reputation: +4622/-480
    • Gender: Male
    THE 1962 MISSAL
    « Reply #3 on: May 15, 2012, 09:13:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Guest
    Do they, or will they celebrate the feasts of Escriva and Divine Mercy etc?


    The don't yet, as far as I know.  
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »