Author Topic: Tea Party (Read 2790 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** August 20, 2014, 05:26:02 PM »

Democrats republican independents and even tea party
Are anti-Catholic. :devil2: :devil2: :devil2:

OHCA · « **Reply #1 on:** August 20, 2014, 10:47:05 PM »

Yes--you're right. Push the CANDIDATES who promote Catholic ideals--there doesn't currently exist a party, nor even a faction as best I can tell, deserving of a Catholic's 100% committed loyalty.

But that doesn't mean don't participate. Just always think about which candidate BEST advances Catholic ideals.

Caveat to my general thoughts that it's best to participate--if both candidates (and no alternatives) are aborionists, then one may make a statement by not participating. But don't just sit at home like non-voting Joe Schmoe--be very vocal about neither candidate being worth a $#!+ and that you didn't vote and be very specific about the reason(s) that you didn't.

Btw--why put this in anonymous section?

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #2 on:** August 20, 2014, 11:17:09 PM »

OHCA - I disagree with you. If a candidate for congress has a soft spot or error, it particularly will be what is exploited. If a catholic is aware of this error in the candidate, I do not recommend they vote for them. That candidate will be a disappointment.

OHCA · « **Reply #3 on:** August 20, 2014, 11:33:37 PM »

I'm not sure what point you're disagreeing with. I acknowledge that parties are anti-Catholic and I even make a case for not voting in some instances. I infer that you would refrain from voting at all in more instances that I would.

I'm not sure that I understand what you mean by saying that you wouldn't vote for candidates with soft sports or errors. Please give examples or explain more thoroughly.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #4 on:** August 21, 2014, 01:02:47 AM »

OHCA-
Do you have any picks among those likely to run for president in 2016?

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #5 on:** August 21, 2014, 05:11:30 AM »

Well went to my state tea party FB page and can't even post anything and the posters are majority of Jєωιѕн posters. One guy quotes a Jєωιѕн joke about
Republicans and Gentiles. Instead if state tea party. It should be the Jєωιѕн tea state Party.

I remember years ago Catholics had tea party in state nearby
And they were always pushing fundraisers for Jєωιѕн groups.
They got mad when I said I'm Catholic where their tea party fundraisers.

I'm not anti Semitic. I'm sick if tv and shows mocking Jesus and blessed Mother. And the black mass in Oklahoma is disgusting. The worse is the media coverage of gaza.

The h0Ɩ0cαųst of Christians have been going on for years and no one care. It was ignored
And denied. I remember first reading about it in the Fatima crusader
I remember crying after I read it. I always prayed. It also gave me an education about what was happening in the Middle East thanks to Mr. Vennari. And yet they call Bishop Williamson a h0Ɩ0cαųst World War II denier as the accusers are guilty of being silent and indifferent to the slaughter of Christians which is happening now as we speak. Their denying is worse because it make them an accessory to the h0Ɩ0cαųst of Christians.

Then there is Gaza. It was as if Christian lives didn't matter. All we heard was Israel and Hamas. But not much about the Christians being bombed. Catholics murdered.

World media and US media learned a lot from the nαzιs in regards to propaganda.

And where we live the Catholics are lukewarm Cowards. East Coast liberals heading to Hell.
Since becoming Traditional Catholic it is blessing.

OHCA · « **Reply #6 on:** August 21, 2014, 01:23:51 PM »

Quote from: MaterDominici

OHCA-
Do you have any picks among those likely to run for president in 2016?

If Rand Paul isn't on the ticket, I will be looking at "third" party candidates. If Cruz is nominated, I'll take a close look at him. Neither Romney nor Huckabee will get my vote. I believe Rand Paul is the only one who can possibly keep this country from swirling the rest of the way down the drain.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #7 on:** August 21, 2014, 01:29:24 PM »

Cruz was born in Calgary, he can't run for president.

OHCA · « **Reply #8 on:** August 21, 2014, 05:24:04 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Cruz was born in Calgary, he can't run for president.

And he isn't the right color to invoke the "Kenyan Rule."

tdrev123 · « **Reply #9 on:** August 21, 2014, 06:22:34 PM »

Quote from: Guest

Cruz was born in Calgary, he can't run for president.

You can be president if you are born a citizen even if outside the US, both his parents were citizens at the time of his birth, so he can run for president, it was the same way with Mitt Romney's Father, he was born in Mexico (on a polygamist compound) but both his parents were citizens....at least know the constitution

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #10 on:** August 21, 2014, 07:29:09 PM »

OHCA - Here is an example of a soft spot. In my state a few months ago for voting there was an independent candidate endorsed by the constitutional party. His policies were in order except when you got to his position on immigration(and this is in a state right next door to Mexico!). He stated something along the lines of "we have not formulated our position on immigration, but we will keep you updated and informed when we do"("vote obamacare through, and then we will find out what is in it"). That is a soft spot. He didn't get elected, but if he did, you can guarantee that is where Jєωs will attack and co-opt him. Jєωs currently have so much influence in this country that whoever we vote for has to be of a correct position and honest. If not, all of what they do is done in the name of those who vote for them. This is how those in office escape premature horn grown(to a certain extent).

BTNYC · « **Reply #11 on:** August 22, 2014, 09:24:27 AM »

Consider a recent presidential candidate who is easily the best that Catholics can realistically expect to get in this nation - Rick Santorum.

Catholic, attends the Traditional Latin Mass, is relatively strong (in rhetoric anyway) against fαɢɢօtry, pornography, and abortion...

Sounds great, right? So why don't we all just endorse him?

Because he's a shill for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, that's why. The Jєωs have such control over this nation that elected officials and candidates are only permitted to have slightly varying degrees of ardent support for them... anyone who is able and willing to identify them as the cause of the vast majority of this nation's (and the world's) major problems is a political persona non grata... Try to imagine someone like E. Michael Jones running for public office... He wouldn't make it as far as Dogcatcher.

The illusion of the "conservative candidate" whom Catholics can get behind to turn things around is just another illusion, yet more Jєωιѕн bells and whistles of distraction and deception... or in the case of the Zionist neotrad Santorum, smells and bells and whistles.

Take a look at him now, castigating his own nation for not being helpful enough to the poor Jєωs who merely want to hold onto the land which they have no religious, moral, or legal right to posses by obliterating every man woman and child with a better claim to the land than theirs.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Rick-Santorum-Israel-Gaza-Hamas/2014/08/19/id/589598/

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #12 on:** August 22, 2014, 01:05:39 PM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Consider a recent presidential candidate who is easily the best that Catholics can realistically expect to get in this nation - Rick Santorum.

Catholic, attends the Traditional Latin Mass, is relatively strong (in rhetoric anyway) against fαɢɢօtry, pornography, and abortion...

Sounds great, right? So why don't we all just endorse him?

Because he's a shill for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, that's why. The Jєωs have such control over this nation that elected officials and candidates are only permitted to have slightly varying degrees of ardent support for them... anyone who is able and willing to identify them as the cause of the vast majority of this nation's (and the world's) major problems is a political persona non grata... Try to imagine someone like E. Michael Jones running for public office... He wouldn't make it as far as Dogcatcher.

The illusion of the "conservative candidate" whom Catholics can get behind to turn things around is just another illusion, yet more Jєωιѕн bells and whistles of distraction and deception... or in the case of the Zionist neotrad Santorum, smells and bells and whistles.

Take a look at him now, castigating his own nation for not being helpful enough to the poor Jєωs who merely want to hold onto the land which they have no religious, moral, or legal right to posses by obliterating every man woman and child with a better claim to the land than theirs.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Rick-Santorum-Israel-Gaza-Hamas/2014/08/19/id/589598/

Same with Sam Brownback. He wants the West Bank and Gaza fully incorporated into Israel and the Arabs who currently live there deported to Jordan.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #13 on:** August 22, 2014, 01:23:14 PM »

Quote from: BTNYC

Because he's a shill for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, that's why. The Jєωs have such control over this nation that elected officials and candidates are only permitted to have slightly varying degrees of ardent support for them... anyone who is able and willing to identify them as the cause of the vast majority of this nation's (and the world's) major problems is a political persona non grata...

Does Rand Paul support Israel too?

I saw where Cruz was complaining when flights into Israel were temporarily stopped. That was a disappointment.

If it's a given, though, that they all support the Jєωs, I'd much rather have Paul or Cruz in "charge" than Clinton, even if it only makes me feel better about where things are headed.

BTNYC · « **Reply #14 on:** August 22, 2014, 03:41:32 PM »

Quote from: MaterDominici

Does Rand Paul support Israel too?

Quote from: Rand Paul

“Israel has always been a strong ally of ours and I appreciate that. I voted just this week to give money—more money—to the Iron Dome, so don’t mischaracterize my position on Israel.”

Author Topic: Tea Party (Read 2790 times)

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus

Änσnymσus