The unquenchable thirst for willful ignorance is breathtaking.  

As if all people in this world--except for white men--are incapable of being tribal.  

The entire Old Testament is a struggle for tribalism.  It's in our own religion.  


...Okay, time to hear an ankle-biter's platitude, now.  

As though I argued otherwise.
What slithery passive-aggressive implications you make.  

What's "negro food"?

What's "negro food"?

 Oh well, I'm kinda partial myself; however, I'm not beyond eating carrion and whatever's eating that if it comes to it so, I'm not exactly an epicure.

  I don't understand anyone not liking collared greens and chicken, but as they say, "There's no accounting for taste."

I get it when people get fed up with being "culture sculptured" to death, and I get that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan show be jack-lit whenever its machinations are detected.

I also get it when people wield the Multicult like a weapon, right to the goy plenum; for example, "Look at me and how inclusive and 'down' that I am as I get beat to a pulp fighting the patriarchy, of course, that means white guys, by a bunch of black thugs who care far less about any lives than my signals do."
Another example is having it dawn on you that the likelihood of ever seeing a same colored couple on TV again diminishes by the day, at least until everyone is the same color or a Jєω.

I don't have a particular problem with mixed "race" couples, although it is ill advised in general; however, being force fed it till it leaks into and then floods the world not because it is real, but "because Jєω", is kosher baloney.
However, is the seemingly habitual use of incendiaries always necessary?
I'm not trying to punk you in public, but would you please explain it to me and any else that cares to understand?

I simply insist on using my own vocabulary instead of a Jєω-imposed pc vocabulary.  That doesn't mean that I'm going to be dropping the "n" word in unwarranted contexts.  But "negro" and "colored" are only offensive because they're not pc.  In fact, pc-speak has circled back around to "colored" in "people of color."  Well, that's Spanish syntax and I speak Ingles--so "colored people" it is.  Vocabulary is powerful and I refuse to concede it to a bunch of kikes.

I think we should remember the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Why does it have to be for that motive? Isn't that just "a bunch of kikes" cranking the organ to another tune?

How is doing a thing to spite, and isn't that what "... I refuse to concede it..." means, not very much like a girl who goes out of her way to show her ex how "happy" she is?

Doing it contra them, BECAUSE of them, means that THEY are the ones really running the show, no?