Once two priests were walking by a creek which had risen because of hard rain the day before. They saw a young woman trying to cross. Normally the creek was so low that a child could easily wade it but now it was difficult and she would have had to walk a mile out of her way to stay on land. She lifted her skirt to keep it out of the muddy water and  took off her shoes. One priest carried her across and the other carried her packages. When they had deposited her at her door they continued on their way in silence. The priest who had carried the packages said at length, "How could you stand carrying that trashy woman? Her legs were showing the whole time." The older priest who had carried the young woman sighed and said, "Brother, I baptized that little gal and hear her confession once a week. Besides I put her down at her father's door  half a mile back. Why are you still carrying her in your mind?"

That's what this rant reminds me of. 

The girls dress this way because their fathers take pride in the sɛҳuąƖ attractiveness of their own daughters.

I'm reminded of a young man who posted on CathInfo many years ago saying he wanted to marry a girl who looked like Britney Spears but had the heart of Mother Theresa.  He claimed to be a traditional Catholic.  Go figure.

If this is the same priest, then he's doing SOMEthing.  But what's the next step if the girl shows up again dressed like that?  I could see the girl wearing a similarly immodest dress, but not the same one, and respond, well you didn't tell me not to wear THIS dress.

I knew a priest who regularly preached against immodest dress.  For a week or two, things would get better, but then after a little while it would slide again.  First you had one woman test the waters with a slightly short skirt.  When she got away with it, then a few others came the following week.  And within about a month they were back to veritable mini-skirts.  Then the priest would preach about it again.  And this cycle continued for years.  At some point there needs to be SOME kind of actual enforcement.

On an amusing note, I guess, the primary woman who was always the trailblazer in pushing the limits, the one who tested the waters, got poison ivy all up and down her legs shortly after one of these displays of testing the water and had to wear an ankle-length dress for a few weeks to hide the disfigurement caused by the ivy.

I have noticed, and perhaps it's just me, that when it comes to questions of modesty in dress, it is as though the girls and women almost want to be disciplined about it, that is, first wear the immodest dress, then be told they shouldn't wear that.  I find this way of thinking bizarre, but that's how it seems to be.  I can't quite get my head around knowing it is wrong, neglecting to do what they know is right, having their hand called on it, then complying (at least for a while).  Do the women like getting the attention of the priest?  Do they like having their mode of dress called attention to?  I have to wonder.

The prior pictured with a lady dressed as the original poster described; https://scontent.ftpa1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/38160595_1866071290153618_7337076340945846272_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_oc=AQnTihzQnbT6uq7u8M2GFbKsjK8bDDyl7cmC-Fpu4TA5xZ7-lbSKUuqMWmZCFhXHCkYSk7Dhb9KS2cNbxljd8iaj&_nc_ht=scontent.ftpa1-1.fna&oh=a15f5c34d6feba971e319b7e0624c81d&oe=5E57C343

Members of this forum who approve of the attire in the first picture, especially in close quarters to the Holy Sanctuary, is proof that many "trads" have been conditioned to accept modernism, the occassion of sin, and feminism.

It's lukewarm scuм like you who are extremely dangerous to the Church and society. Your day of reckoning is coming - Apocalypse of John 3:16

You're insane ... with bitter zeal.

I wish that Matthew would abolish the 'anonymous' section. It is just a hide-out place for posters that are of doubtful morality.  
Pornography is not allowed on CI.
I have to many problems that come from the temptations that comes from the world, and the flesh, and the devil.
And see this trash on CI. This makes my day.
If these 'anonymous' do not identify themselves, them kick them off.

I've always found annoying how this section is used as well.  Like I could see it if one were seeking advice regarding a personal sin or something, I mean probably better to ask a priest (And I mean that's probably what I'd suggest too) but like I could maybe see some personal things deserving this.  But this forum gets overused.

I also find the "anyone who's less trad than me is a modernist, anyone who's more trad than me is a prude" attitude kinda annoying.