Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Fake Priests  (Read 111964 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: SSPX Fake Priests
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2025, 11:21:47 AM »
So your website advertises that the SSPX has only satanic priests and doubtful priests - Calumny. You're grossly under catechized to think you are in the position to condemn the SSPX to hell.

You can't say you weren't warned.  
You’re not making any sense.  

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: SSPX Fake Priests
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2025, 01:02:14 PM »
You click on the link, there is a page that has a picture of a satanic priest committing a sacrilege with a caption that says "SSPX Fake Priests."

Fyi, THAT'S calumny, and that is damnable. 
:facepalm:  That’s not a satanic priest.  That’s a novus ordo priest wearing a Mexican-style wrestling mask.  Novus ordo priests love making fun of the mass by wearing clown/sports stuff.  Where you have been?  This has been going on since the 70s.  Visit www.novusordowatch.com for hundreds of pictures.  


Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: SSPX Fake Priests
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2025, 01:14:07 PM »
:facepalm:  That’s not a satanic priest.  That’s a novus ordo priest wearing a Mexican-style wrestling mask.  Novus ordo priests love making fun of the mass by wearing clown/sports stuff.  Where you have been?  This has been going on since the 70s.  Visit www.novusordowatch.com for hundreds of pictures. 
What is it doing there? Is the website about novus ordo? That website in the OP is saying that is an sspx priest, which is a lie no matter how much he hates sspx priests.   
You’re not making any sense. 
Figure it out.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: SSPX Fake Priests
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2025, 02:41:25 PM »
What is it doing there? Is the website about novus ordo? That website in the OP is saying that is an sspx priest
Let's make it clearer (in case you don't know):

1.  The new-sspx is accepting novus ordo priests (i.e. have been ordained in the 'new rites').  Just like they accepted "bishop" Huonder.
2.  The new-sspx is NOT conditionally ordaining these "priests".  
3.  The new rites are doubtfully valid.  These "priests" are doubtful.  
4.  Canon Law prohibits using/saying/attending doubtful masses/sacraments under penalty of mortal sin (i.e. except in danger of death).
5.  Anyone who accepts or attends masses/sacraments of doubtful priests commits a grave sin (if there's not a danger of death).
6.  The new-sspx is committing grave sins by introducing doubtful priests into their chapels.
7.  These doubtful priests also have doubtful seminary training and doubtful views on Tradition and doctrine, being they were trained in the novus ordo.
8.  This site is meant to identify such doubtful priests so that Trads can avoid them and also to obey canon law, and avoid grave sins.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: SSPX Fake Priests
« Reply #14 on: July 29, 2025, 03:16:12 PM »
Let's make it clearer (in case you don't know):

1.  The new-sspx is accepting novus ordo priests (i.e. have been ordained in the 'new rites').  Just like they accepted "bishop" Huonder.
2.  The new-sspx is NOT conditionally ordaining these "priests". 
3.  The new rites are doubtfully valid.  These "priests" are doubtful. 
4.  Canon Law prohibits using/saying/attending doubtful masses/sacraments under penalty of mortal sin (i.e. except in danger of death).
5.  Anyone who accepts or attends masses/sacraments of doubtful priests commits a grave sin (if there's not a danger of death).
6.  The new-sspx is committing grave sins by introducing doubtful priests into their chapels.
7.  These doubtful priests also have doubtful seminary training and doubtful views on Tradition and doctrine, being they were trained in the novus ordo.
8.  This site is meant to identify such doubtful priests so that Trads can avoid them and also to obey canon law, and avoid grave sins.
I'm not arguing what the SSPX is doing, although you are wrong on some of your points.  
So based on all that, you figure that those points justifies you putting a satanic NO priest as being representative of the SSPX? It's a terrible, even scandalous first impression on newbies.
 
Since when have two wrongs made a right?