Author Topic: SSPX Fake Priests (Read 112079 times)

Änσnymσus · « **on:** July 28, 2025, 05:10:28 PM »

So, the title is a bit of hyperbole, but I felt it was necessary to get their attention ... vs. just "Priest Workign with the SSPX who May Not Be Valid".

I would no more overstate my position that they're certainly invalid ... that permit them to overstate theirs that they ARE valid, and I'll actually use the hyperbole to make precisely that point. You'd be right to criticize me for asserting their invalidity, but for the same reason you cannot impose your opinion regarding validity on everyone's consciences either.

I will make that clear in the opening posts on the main page, what I mean by it ... and will also include links explaining why they're dead wrong to impose their opinion on the consciences of the faithful, and lots of other things, but those will be just links off to the side.

Mostly it'll be tracking the "Fake Priests" themselves.

https://sspxfakepriests.substack.com

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #1 on:** July 28, 2025, 05:11:05 PM »

I started this in Anonymous in case others wanted to make contributions without risking excommunication from SSPX chapels.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #2 on:** July 28, 2025, 11:18:34 PM »

Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 28, 2025, 05:11:05 PM

I started this in Anonymous in case others wanted to make contributions without risking excommunication from SSPX chapels.

Excommunication is a spiritual judgment. If someone throw another out of a particular SSPX chapel, that’s a local, probably not even a civil action unless there’s a court order of protection involved. It has no bearing on one’s spiritual condition.

Änσnymσus · « **Reply #3 on:** July 29, 2025, 04:58:50 AM »

Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 28, 2025, 05:10:28 PM

So, the title is a bit of hyperbole, but I felt it was necessary to get their attention ... vs. just "Priest Workign with the SSPX who May Not Be Valid".

I would no more overstate my position that they're certainly invalid ... that permit them to overstate theirs that they ARE valid, and I'll actually use the hyperbole to make precisely that point. You'd be right to criticize me for asserting their invalidity, but for the same reason you cannot impose your opinion regarding validity on everyone's consciences either.

I will make that clear in the opening posts on the main page, what I mean by it ... and will also include links explaining why they're dead wrong to impose their opinion on the consciences of the faithful, and lots of other things, but those will be just links off to the side.

Mostly it'll be tracking the "Fake Priests" themselves.

https://sspxfakepriests.substack.com

It's blank. So it's not "a bit of hyperbole," it's calumny.

AMDGJMJ · « **Reply #4 on:** July 29, 2025, 06:00:07 AM »

Quote from: Änσnymσus on July 28, 2025, 05:10:28 PM

So, the title is a bit of hyperbole, but I felt it was necessary to get their attention ... vs. just "Priest Workign with the SSPX who May Not Be Valid".

I would no more overstate my position that they're certainly invalid ... that permit them to overstate theirs that they ARE valid, and I'll actually use the hyperbole to make precisely that point. You'd be right to criticize me for asserting their invalidity, but for the same reason you cannot impose your opinion regarding validity on everyone's consciences either.

I will make that clear in the opening posts on the main page, what I mean by it ... and will also include links explaining why they're dead wrong to impose their opinion on the consciences of the faithful, and lots of other things, but those will be just links off to the side.

Mostly it'll be tracking the "Fake Priests" themselves.

https://sspxfakepriests.substack.com

Great idea! This is very much needed. Prayers for everyone helping with it!

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: SSPX Fake Priests (Read 112079 times)

Änσnymσus

SSPX Fake Priests

Änσnymσus

Re: SSPX Fake Priests

Änσnymσus

Re: SSPX Fake Priests

Änσnymσus

Re: SSPX Fake Priests

AMDGJMJ

Re: SSPX Fake Priests