If Siri was the pope why did he publicly recognize the anti-popes as popes during the time he was the pope, and why did he lead others to believe the anti-popes were true popes?
There is indisputable evidence that Gregory XVII fought the V2 sect's new religion - as his own priests in Genoa for years testified. He told his priests not to say the new mass. He said the decrees of the Second Vatican Council could "never bind". Logically the True Pope de jure, Gregory XVII, could only make such a statement [declaration] if the V2 Council docuмents LACKED papal jurisdiction (Church Authority) - which they incontrovertibly did.
Some say "but he recognized the antipopes". Yet, Pope St. Martin I, who recognized Antipope Eugene I, did not cease being pope [forfeit his office] as he, like Gregory XVII, was put under grave duress, by the Church's enemies.
There are numerous quotes showing that Pius XII's hand-picked successor, Gregory XVII, despised Roncalli and all of the post-conciliar false claimants and their V-2 cult.
Right reason alone, resolves these absolute contradictions, from this Genoan genius, who so loved Holy Mother Church. In a near miraculous type moment, out of view from the ever present and threatening masonic handlers, he was able to express the horrific fact that his jailors could, "kill", him "at any time!"
Unconvincing.
I guess you have not researched this reality, enough. Perhaps schism has blinded you.
"magisterium", perhaps schism has blinded you.