A friend of ours who is a Irish-Catholic  retired detective for the local prosecutor's office just visted us recently.  we were talking about farming and hunting and Catholicism.  I asked him if he was a member of the Masons.  he admitted that he was.  Of course , I told him that the Masons are the enemies of the Catholic Church, etc.  He advised us that are many lawyers, doctors, police officers who are vatican II catholic and are Masons.   Also, i looked down at the t shirt he had on.  It was one of those new age t shirts that usually young kids wear with skullls and such.  However, his T-shirt had the devil with skeleton skull and horns.  My husband was upset too.  He asked him where did he get that evil shirt?        

so what kind of friends do you have D? what does this say of you?

People who self-label themselves as "traditionalists" often demonize anyone who is not a self-proclaimed traditionalist.

Potatoes are potatoes and oranges are oranges, freemasons are freemasons and catholics are catholics. A catholic might be:

1) a faithful catholic
2) an ignorant catholic, such as a baby that has been baptized just a few seconds ago
3) a person who is catholic just in name, but never goes to mass, etc... a lukewarm person
4) a person who is catholic on the outside at a 100%, but deep inside conspires against the church, that is an infiltrator

There are of course, more types of people who are catholic, and the infiltrators are everywhere. Such infiltrators might be freemasons, but not only freemasons infiltrate the church. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs do it too, just to pick an example.

I don't demonize the catholic who is ignorant and therefore does not attend to traditional latin masses, I don't even like the terms: NO catholic, Novus Ordo catholic, and so on.

All those terms imply that the ignorant has full knowledge, and is therefore RESPONSIBLE and GUILTY of intentional heresy.

I am guessing, although they are wrong, many of them mean to do good. They have been misled by the catholic hierarchy, and for that they are not guilty. They didn't call for a second vatican council, they didn't change the mass, make sure you put the guilt where it belongs.

There could be freemasons who are traditionalists too, I don't see why some people are so naive. Why wouldn't freemasons infiltrate traditionalists groups too?

It would be irrational for me to conclude that because I have discovered (hypothetically) that one, two, or many traditionalists are freemasons, then ALL traditionalists are freemasons.

Likewise, it isn't logical to say that all catholics who are not attending to TLM masses are freemasons.

As you can see I am catholic, and I believe in the unity (catholicity) of the church, therefore, I am not inclined to slice the church into subgroups. Sure, these are hard and confusing times, but demonizing your fellow catholics because they do not yet see what you have seen doesn't help.

Yes that's right.  Just because you associate with known masons doesn't make you a mason.  The same goes for satanists.  Just because you attend church with them does not make you a satanist.

How do you know that there aren't any freemasons inside the so-called traditionalism?

They infiltrate everything, and still you will attend to a TLM mass. Nearby, one of them might be there.

That would not make you a freemason.

Your argument, on reverse...